Stock EVO dyno results

[perfworks]

Just in case anyone would like to see what my new baby does stock. This is a baseline completely stock and then a reflash with some fuel and timing adjustments done to the stock ecu on a dyno.

 

[perfworks]

just in case soem cant see.
The stock figures are: 263.4 WHP and 277 WTRQ
After the reflash : 287.5 WHP and 298.4 WTRQ

 

[StarvingRussian]

Holy s***, that's a lotta torque.

 

[perfworks]

Holy s***, that's a lotta torque.

Id like to see what she does with the boost turned up

 

[Matthew]

omg what a car. so it only loses less than 10hp to the wheels from the crank? its stock crank hp is 271 if im not mistaken.

 

[StarvingRussian]

yeah, thats really good, it was 270 somethin, 276?

 

[Midnight22]

ok... all those cars that r losing to neons... drivers just simply cant drive...

 

[Familia323]

those are some nice gains from a reflash and some tuning.... I'll be happy when I can give a stock Evo a decent run...

 

[perfworks]

omg what a car. so it only loses less than 10hp to the wheels from the crank? its stock crank hp is 271 if im not mistaken.

They are quite underrated from the factory.

 

[StarvingRussian]

ok... all those cars that r losing to neons... drivers just simply cant drive...

i think some of the neons were modded

 

[perfworks]

ok... all those cars that r losing to neons... drivers just simply cant drive...

noen is much lighter also. They make some good power down low.
There is a couple around here. I trounce them everytime i see them. I dont know who is losing. If it was on the track then i could understand, because it is very hard to launch theses cars with AWD.
but after 30mph its all over

 

[StarvingRussian]

how come they are hard to launch?

ive seen a video where an srt4 was whompin on a evo, i dont think the neon was stock though.

 

[hukster00]

is the ecu flash factory one like the one on msp ?

 

[perfworks]

how come they are hard to launch?

ive seen a video where an srt4 was whompin on a evo, i dont think the neon was stock though.

AWD is alot more difficult. It seems to want to jump rather than spin the tires. It has such good traction that it (without exageration) will plant and jump then take off. If you dont rev it and hold it to the right rpm while letting out the clutch slow she bogs horribly.
But once you remove this pesky restrictor dampner it has in the clutch hydralics along with the reflash it is all but eliminated completely

 

[perfworks]

is the ecu flash factory one like the one on msp ?

Basically the same. But the difference is that the MSP can only be done by the dealer. The mitsu can be done by aftermarket tuners to get more power out of the ecu and car by tuning it to your needs and gas preference.
The car came tuned for 91 octane from the factory.
Basically mazda and ford dont want anyone playing with the ecu.
So it can only be done if you know someone willing to do it for you.

 

[PaulMP3]

damn, i didnt relize they had that much power in stock form. What is your goal (whp) for this car?

 

[perfworks]

damn, i didnt relize they had that much power in stock form. What is your goal (whp) for this car?

Realistically speaking, we have in the works 550 at the wheels.
Stock internals have seen over 450 WHP in some but we are going completely aftermarket forged and stage II cams from JUN.
30 -33 psi of boost and happy motoring!!

 

[flat_black]

Wow... Just... Wow.

 

[Micah]

To those people who can't figure out why the Neon SRT-4 is able to whup on Lancer EVO's.

SRT4 2970lbs
EVO 3263lbs (3298 with sunroof)

SRT4 225HP @5400rpm
EVO 271HP@6500rpm

SRT4 245 Torque
EVO 273 Torque

Other SRT4 junk:
Acceleration:
0-30 : 2.5 sec
0-60 : 5.6 sec
30-50 pass : 2 sec
50-70 pass : 3 sec
1/4 mile : 14.2 sec. at 99.5 MPH
Other stuff:

skidpad (200ft) : .85 g's
braking (60-0) : 119 ft

Wish I could find the above info on the EVO.

Anyway, here's my point. The Neon should pull on the EVO. It weighs roughly 300 pounds less. It's not pushing all-wheel-drive. The SRT4 - however, still looks like a skittle. It's a great car to take to the track, and for racing on Rt. 37 (you toms river kids know what I'm talking about) not to mention that it has MOPAR behind it, which means a good deal of aftermarket support.

The EVO, on the other hand - has more power, more weight, and all-wheel-drive. If you were to take these cars road racing, with a little bit of off-road trails thrown in, I'm fairly sure the EVO would still be holding the road/path and accelerating while the SRT4 had already lost traction.

That being said - I really wish I had either of these cars. Perf, you suck for buying your evo - but with those payments, I can't afford to suck like you do. However, if I could somehow win the damn lottery, I'd be driving an EVO.

But my car is back to stock, and I miss the acceleration of a turbocharged engine. I'm hoping I can make more payments on my car for about a year - and some extra payments so that I owe less on it. Then maybe I'll be able to trade it in for something quick.

Currently I'm looking at eithera Saturn Redline (200HP Supercharged - under $20K) or a Dodge Neon SRT-4. I just can't stand the idea of paying more than $300 a month for a car payment. On the other hand, I might just keep my protege and buy an old 3rd gen F-Body.

 

[LinuxRacr]

Damn, I pay $350 per month for my MP3! I bought it in 2001 though. Add the turbo payment, and it goes up!