Still waiting? No deposit? Read this.

psifactor said:
I guess you are right about the two cars having close to the same potential.

Just because mazda did a bad job...All they did was add a turbo kit. Most real turbo cars are designed for turbos. Such as the 4g63 which will hold up to 450hp and still love you. The EJ20 is also alot more friendly wiht boost...But the 4g63 and the EJ20's trannys both suck. I have come to the conclusion that the japeneese do not know how to make Strong Transmissions.

To make Any of thoes cars as i mentioned before you would have to rebuild the engine to actually support any amount of horsepower.

I have been really dissapointed in all of the new prodution cars. I cannot really think of a new car around 25k that I would like to own. The only things that come to mind are the STI, and EVO8. Look at the 350Z, RX8,Eclipise...none of thoes are turbo anymore
:(
Oh well..I guess I'm going to have to stick to old school or get a sti!!!

acctually it's not that the japanese can't build strong trannys...it's getting a combination of a strong engine and a strong tranny.

The Mazda's engine is decent for boosting, it can probally take 12-14 psi reliably, but the tranny will die far before that.

The Sentra's Tranny...it's like umm indestructable you could say, in terms of holding power, according to the tranny's manu website, it can hold up to 400 lb-ft of torque before breaking. But the engine, will blow before that, unless if you find some meraclous way to make that much power all NA on a 2.5L 4 banger.

the RX8 really doesn't impress me, personally. It handles well, but it's lacking the power, I'd much rather get a G35 Coupe, because it can easily be made to handle just as well, with more power.

the 350Z...it's bubbly, G35 looks nicer, and handles almost as nice...and Nismo has a G35 suspension kit comming out.

The only real new cars I'm intrested in are the STi, Evo, and the G35 coupe.

They will be until mazda shows me a real sucessor to the RX7, and until nissan decides to show us a real skyline, Z car, and silvia.

all and all though, we really can't complain about our cars, they're ecnoboxes, the low end of the scale, so obviously nissan and mazda arn't gonna throw money into these cars. They're good for what they are.

The most logical reasons for Nissan and Mazda making these two cars the Spec V and the MSP are: Mazda is phasing out the protege soon, so they wanted it to go out with a bang...they're also phasing out the engine, so to make none of them go to waste, they will throw on a turbo, and hype up the car so it sells, so they can get rid of left over invatory.

The Spec V is diffrent...Nissan was trying to do a revival of it's old sports cars with the 350Z comming out, they wanted to revive the old school SE-R, but they did it also so they could phase out the Sentra SE which used the SR20 engine, which they wanted to stop using since it was making it hard to pass emissions. Nissan also needed a way to bring attention to a car that wasn't selling as well as it used to be.

Mazda and Nissan both made these cars to save money, they didn't exacly do the best job on them. We can't expect them to, we're still driving their low end models.

If I really wanted to turn an ecnobox into a race car...it would have to be an EG6 Civic, the aftermarket for that car is just amazing. It can be all to easy to make a civic a 10 second beast on the drag strip, while easily carving corners in autox.

I really hope the MSP and the Spec V do something for the aftermarket of Nissans and Mazda though, the aftermarket has always been lagging behind for both companies.
 
and until nissan decides to show us a real skyline, Z car, and silvia.
Have you seen the skyline that we are getting over here...IT SUCKS
I could not find the info I wanted on it..but here is a link
http://www.rapidcars.com/gtrpics.html
http://www.gtr.co.uk/html/
how can they put a v8 in that car...its just wrong!!!!!!

The cars now still suck...
7 to 12 years ago then had the rx-7, 300zx, steath/3000gt, supra, celica gt-4, integra typeR, and Talon/Eclipise. Thats all I could think of right now. I'm just really dissapointed in what they are making now. I know some of the cars I mentioned are a little on the high side of price..But the cars today just dont compare to them.



The only other tranny I can think of that would hold any power are the turbo II, the MKIII 5 speed, and the MKIV 6s peed.

I really dont know a whole lot about the se-r...I'm just suprised that thay made a good tranny for it. Nothing is better than shifting as quickly as possible. I learned my lesson the 1st time and have got this tranny to last so far:)



Kelly
 
psifactor said:

Have you seen the skyline that we are getting over here...IT SUCKS
I could not find the info I wanted on it..but here is a link
http://www.rapidcars.com/gtrpics.html
http://www.gtr.co.uk/html/
how can they put a v8 in that car...its just wrong!!!!!!

The cars now still suck...
7 to 12 years ago then had the rx-7, 300zx, steath/3000gt, supra, celica gt-4, integra typeR, and Talon/Eclipise. Thats all I could think of right now. I'm just really dissapointed in what they are making now. I know some of the cars I mentioned are a little on the high side of price..But the cars today just dont compare to them.



The only other tranny I can think of that would hold any power are the turbo II, the MKIII 5 speed, and the MKIV 6s peed.

I really dont know a whole lot about the se-r...I'm just suprised that thay made a good tranny for it. Nothing is better than shifting as quickly as possible. I learned my lesson the 1st time and have got this tranny to last so far:)



Kelly

The tranny it self, if you misshift you can blow it, like if you force it into gears, like going from 6th 4000 rpm into second, it'll blow (obviously)

yea, the funny thing is the reason the Spec V got a good tranny is because nissan is trying to save money, so they reused the beefy tranny right off the maxima :)
 
Damoes what made you think that the mazdaspeed protege would not make a good daily driver? Just some of the simple features like sunroof and cruise control?

I cannot believe that it does not have cruise control.....I will have to check that out...why would mazda leave that out?
 
Last edited:
psifactor said:
Damoes what made you think that the mazdaspeed protege would not make a good daily driver? Just some of the simple features like sunroof and cruise control?

I cannot believe that it does not have cruise control.....I will have to check that out...why would mazda leave that out?

Well, for me it wouldn't be as good of a daily driver. If I owned one I'd still use it as a daily driver

The Seats arn't as comfy, no sunroof, no cruise, and the low end grunt just isn't there which I think is nice for a daily driver.

Overall the MSP still makes a great car, but IMO the spec makes a better just day to day driver.

Just the small things that make a diffrence, the sound system in both cars are bleh, but I can live with them.

IT's like just the small things that make the MSP a slightly better performing car, ie no sunroof makes the body more rigid, no cruise control/sunroof make the car lighter.

If I don't get the 240SX I want, I'm gonna mod the hell outta the spec, but the only thing I want to mod if I don't mod the hell out of the car is coilovers/rims/tires/antiroll (can't believe nissan didn't even add those on, the rear has a "intergrated anti-roll bar" but it doesn't do jack all for anti-roll momentum heh...) That'll fix the ride quality issue, which is really the only issue I have with it. Hopefully I won't get too carried away, and before I know it throw all my money into the spec, so I can't even afford a project car hehe.
 
Last edited:
That SpecV was also a 2002 and there are a number of improvements with the 2003's namely a gearbox with shorter gearing down low so the times have improved a little. I alos heard a rumour that they chenged the shock valving to improve performance and ride quality.
 
buster said:
That SpecV was also a 2002 and there are a number of improvements with the 2003's namely a gearbox with shorter gearing down low so the times have improved a little. I alos heard a rumour that they chenged the shock valving to improve performance and ride quality.

BHAHAHA I wish they would change the shocks, it would help handling sooooo much.

The shocks are what seriously kill the spec v's handing, which is already really good, concerdering that it doesn't have any real Anti Roll bars, it can still be counted as one of the top 3 handling FWD cars (stock that is). Pulling off nice skidpad numbers and slalom speeds.

But no, the shocks are identical to the ones found on the sentra XE, the ride height is the same as the sentra xe which is the base base base model of the sentra.

All nissan did was throw stiffer springs, a front sway bar, a retuned rear axle and rear suspension, and HLSD.

the shocks on my car are worthless, heh, that's what you get when you have to save money to make a car.

The tranny is diffrent, but the box, and syncros have been revised, and the gear ratios are slightly longer in 1st and 2nd, shorter in 3rd and 4th, same in 5th, and longer in 6th for better fuel economey.

the 2003s are probally just slightly faster, but probally not noticable by normal people. The gearbox however is much greatly improved, and same with the seat fabric/colours :).

I guess nissan could of put more work into the shocks, and anti roll bars, I wouldn't of minded paying a bit more for them, I mean, if Nissan can make an SUV (the FX45) out slalom a G35 coupe, and a SUV that outhandles most cars on the road...they could of made the b15 chassis handle a bit better :)
 
my opinion is that they are both good depending on the person

price wise: the spec v wins as it can be bought for like 3g's (fully loaded) cheaper in canada

performance: mazdaspeed (turbo, racing beat, tokico and the rest)

styling: tie (don't like how orange is only in canada, and the spec v has a fugly back)

bang for the buck: i think the mazdaspeed has a little edge as it comes with a factory turbo, tokico, sparco, racing beat suspension

handling n supension: drove the spec v, wasn't that great at handling, breaks lose, torque steer, mad wheel spin. can't say for sure for the mazdaspeed, as i have not driven one yet. but from what i hear, it is amazing handling, but the ride isn't that smooth.

potential: depends. the spec v has more potential with a turbo (if jwt ever produces it), the mazdaspeed i think has more potential as it is factory turbo and will be easier to modify since it is. flip side, the spec v goes up close to 20 hp and 20 lbs tq from headers and a balance shaft removal and if cams ever come out (jwt again!) car can running close to 200 hp at wheel n/a (with the help of a cai and ecu)

price visited again: i can get a base spec v for 25 out of the dealership, 7 g's cheaper than mazda in canada.
edge: spec v

extra features: spec v: cruise control (not that great), sun roff ( i can live without one
mazdaspeed: turbo! (i like listening to turbo cars more)

if u got less to spend the base spec v is the way to go, if got a bit more, the mazdaspeed is the better one. 32g's versus around 25.
i personally bought the mazdaspeed after test driving the spec v, and reading all the great reviews about it.
 
transmission: spec v gear box isn't smooth and has clunk, but i have driven both the 2002 and 2003, and must say the 2003 has been greatly improved.

from what i read: the 2002 spec v's have some mad problems going to the transmission to the oil burning.

the key here is: 2003 spec v is probably okay, 2002 spec v is a no no.
 
the sound system in both cars are bleh
The sound system in the mazdaspeed is awsome. Well again..I'm not into the best systems, but it come with a kenwood front deck, 450watt amp, and a 10' sub woofer. I blieve this is one of the best factory sounding systems I have ever heard in a lower end car.


If I don't get the 240SX I want
..What one do you want. I have one currently :)

If I really wanted to turn an ecnobox into a race car...it would have to be an EG6 Civic, the aftermarket for that car is just amazing. It can be all to easy to make a civic a 10 second beast on the drag strip, while easily carving corners in autox.
...um ok.
how many 10s cars have you seen at autox?? NONE. you cannot mix a full drag car with autox, especially a 10s one. I took my car thats only a 12s car and is SUCKED at the scca events. You dont need a fast car at autox. Just a good handling car.

Have you ever seen a 12s honda driving around on the road? It near to impossible to the adverage joe without lots of money. I do know of one, Its a accord and it kicks ass. (it also has like 30k+ under the hood)

Just because the aftermarket is good does not mean its a good drag car. A civic would be one of my last choices to make a drag car. First its front wheel drive, Then engine is not built for any kind of horsepower.

If you want to make a 10 s car..save yourself 10 of thousands of dollars and start with another car. It would be alot cheaper to get a mkIV or mkIII and turn up the boost (thats good for 12's right there) Get a 300zx do a few basic mods and your all ready in the 12's). A starion with a FMIC, upgraded fuel system, Boost controler, and a like 20g will put you easily in the 12's (all that for under 5k) The 4g63 is probably one of the 4cyl's with the most potential. do the fuel system, turn up the boost, FMIC, 18g, and you will be in the 12's if you know how to tune:).

If you dont have tons of money to spend making a 10s cars stay away from hondas. it is one of the harder cars to actually make fast. Sure we all know the kids that have turbos on their honda, but they are still in the 14's. why would you want to take a car that ran 17's stock and try to make it a 10's car?

Stick with the sr20det or the ca18det in a 240sx..thoes are both great engine that you will not have to pay a fortune to get into the 12's.

only 4cyl's that I would ever want to mess with:)
3sgte
4g63
ej20
f20
4g55b

do the sr20det or at least get something more worth your while.
 
Great another Daemos and his Spec V vs the world thread.

What's the expression?

...sounds like a broken record.
 
This has not turned into a thread about the spec v vr. the msp. We have all figured out they both suck. Neither car was made for power.
 
newf come to winnipeg, we got our one and only MSP still sitting in the show room floor.

You may want to avoid it, since it's been ragged on, and the seats arn't too supportive. But the engine has been ragged on, that's the thing that should worry you.

Apparently no one in winnipeg wants a MSP.

I agree both the MSP and the Spec V both suck, but they're still good for ecnoboxes turned sport compact.

But in comparison to like RX7 TTs, Supras, Silvias, they're pathetic cars.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't doubt were going to see a lot of MSP's sitting around here in Canada, small towns especially. Why....ummmmm, because it's orange ! A lot of people, besides true car guys, just don't like it. the Average joe just doesn't seem to like orange.

Not only that, but it's unique market, one with few buyers, even fewer making the right amount of $$$, and one that is becoming more and more flooded ( it's not flooded yet but you know what I'm getting at ) with other manufactures releasing other sweet deals, srt4, spec , vw's, soon to be sir bla bla, that are actually getting to market ON TIME. Mazda may have rekindled (spelling?) the segment with the mp3, but, due to constant delays, they are going to pay for it, and as a result, their so called limited edition car is is becoming less of a demand then it was. they KNOW, if the 2003.5 are out at the same time, that eithier they will loose money on the 2003's, or, because of the loud color orange, they just won't sell.

Imagine, summer time, you go to the dealer, there's a yellow, Titanium, Orange, blue and silver one sitting there. Which color do you think will get looked at the most? Matter of opinion really, but the orange will be sitting there the longest imho, due to color, and the fact it's a 2003. Rumour is up here, the 2003.5 may get the new warranties. I never looked into it, don't know if it's true, but if it is, that's another thing the 2003's won't have going for them
 
Last edited:
oh, and as for the seats, I don't know what peoples problems are with them I come from accords, preludes, leather seats etc and so on, and I find them just fine. And I'm someone that has had his neck broken, back severely f'd up, and I can't sit in anything but these seats are just fine. I traded in a 2000 civic for this, and those seats were pathetic. I'd last an hour in them before my hack was killing me. As for taking sharp corners, i think people get really anal when complaining about the seats, their fine. Sure, they could be better, but this is a basically an small non-expensive car.
 
I acctually really like the orange color, it's unique, and looks good on the MSP.

I think the main reason that the car hasn't been sold yet, is because of the report on the dealership, and the markup, someone told me the dealership was marking up the car because it's the only one that will be comming to winnipeg, which is stupid.

Talking about seats...I'm really picky about them, even my parent's 2003's altima seats I find unconfortable, and the seats in our mini van are just flat.

The Spec V's seats are really supportive, and I wouldn't mind changing them to real sparco or recaro seats, but I don't want to lose my side impact airbags, which will probally save my life.
the best stock seats I've ever sat in must either be the RX7 TT's seats, or the 350Z seats, those are REALLY supportive and comfy seats.

But, yea I like the 2003 MSP orange, personally I don't like the look of the 2003.5s as much, the big ass wing, no fogs, increase in price, not worth it IMO.

I'd personally stick with the mp3 that you have over the MSP. Since if you wanted to serously boost with the MSP, you'd be replacing most of the compoents of the turbo anyways, ie intercooler, piping, bov, computer management, better turbo, wastegates etc. That's like buying a whole new Turbo kit. And I also like the color of the MP3 more, and you KNOW your car will be more unique than the MSP since mazda is making more MSPs now.

Apparently as well the MP3's sound system is better due to a bigger sub, 10" vs 8".
 
I think the main reason that the car hasn't been sold yet, is because of the report on the dealership, and the markup, someone told me the dealership was marking up the car because it's the only one that will be comming to winnipeg, which is stupid.


Well, that's not going to help sell it at all.


As for the mp3/msp thing. Your right, the color is better on mine :) I do personally like the orange though, but I am glad I never got it. After seeing the guy here with one almost daily, I'm almost tired of it now. I don't mind the titanium color, but it's no laser blue though. The wing I can get past, the fogs I'm putting in, and the extra $$$ isn't fair, but i think I can work something out for it. once I'm done, it'll be nice i'm sure. Beleive it or not the only complaint I have ever had about the mp3 was the ..... spoiler. Not everyone likes it, even the guys at Mazda commented on the speed when they first saw pics of it said, "they could have at least changed the spoile" Personally, I love it.

As for stereo. Your right again, I personally like the mp3 better, the head unit is better, the rear deck speakers are nice
i've got two subs identical to the mp3's one so that's no problem, I'll just stick that into the speed for now maybe get a real setup later if I care too. The msp one does sound really good though.

I can't get aftermarket turbo's here, it's just not feasable, and no one here can take care of it. If I could go that route, I'd have a spoolin setup right now and just keep the mp3 and the speed wouldn't even be a consideration. I do like having full warranties though.

So, I'm hoping to get into a speed, have a turbo with a warranty, keep it for about 2 years, maybe get the next one hopefully with REAL horsepower, and AWD. Or just get a new subie :) I wish we had a subie dealership close to me.

take care
 
Last edited:
I've heard a rumour that all the orange ones in BC are done. And are just waiting for people to buy them before moving.

I can't confirm it yet from a reliable source.

Where's digi when we need em? :)
 
best stock seats I've ever sat in must either be the RX7 TT's seats, or the 350Z seats, those are REALLY supportive and comfy seats.
mkIII is the best I have ever sat in. Too bad they are just power adjustable like 8 different ways. (have to be 80lbs+)
 

New Threads and Articles

Back