I've read many (boatfrickenload) opinions and thoughts concerning the advantages/disadvantages of going NA and turbo. To this I add my own ...
On paper, turbo seems to be the most financially sound investment. However ... as several posts have mentioned, you are paying for many other things afterwards, including dyno tests and subsequent tuning. The dyno tests alone are $200, by some estimates. That's the price of an Injen CAI. How much of a hole in my wallet would these additional costs create ?
Meanwhile, N/A bolt-ons are mostly install and forget, so I'd only really be paying for parts, but only receive a modest gain at best.
So ... keeping after-installation costs in mind, what's really more cost effective ?
Let the debate begin!
P.S. Please think about what you post before you click the mouse button. Let's not turn this into a 'who-can-come-up-with-the-best-insults' free for all. I really wish to learn something.
On paper, turbo seems to be the most financially sound investment. However ... as several posts have mentioned, you are paying for many other things afterwards, including dyno tests and subsequent tuning. The dyno tests alone are $200, by some estimates. That's the price of an Injen CAI. How much of a hole in my wallet would these additional costs create ?
Meanwhile, N/A bolt-ons are mostly install and forget, so I'd only really be paying for parts, but only receive a modest gain at best.
So ... keeping after-installation costs in mind, what's really more cost effective ?
Let the debate begin!
P.S. Please think about what you post before you click the mouse button. Let's not turn this into a 'who-can-come-up-with-the-best-insults' free for all. I really wish to learn something.
