080669 said:
So, you're saying given a choice between 91 and 93, put in 93?
I would. I am sure Mazda is releasing the CX-7 with the update that the new MS6 firmware provides. Mazda recommends 91 or above with the MS6, but most of us needed to use 93 (if we're in an area of the country that can get it) to avoid the oversensitive knock sensor from being tripped. I have just made it a matter of fact to get 93, and I think if you asked over on the MS6 forum, most of the people over there do the same.
I doubt you will need to be that careful with the CX-7, since hopefully Mazda learned a little about American gasoline. There's some site out there that lists the highest quality gasolines based upon quality control and cleaning power. I forget where it is, maybe someone here knows where it is. I looked at the list and the only distributor on the list here in NY was Shell, so I started using that exclusively (and got a shell gas card that I use JUST for gasoline -- $30 in rebates so far, and it takes the hit out of the extra I spend on premium fuel). I know Chevron is on the list too, but I forget what other companies are on there.
Sorry to go on... I think the point is that if you use quality fuels, I think you'll be all right with 91, but my earlier point was that you do NOT want to tempt "emergency mode" by using anything less. If it was my car, I would use 93. I wouldn't bother with 94 even if I could get it here (Sunoco stopped selling it here a few years ago).
I know some people claim that all gasoline comes from the same tankers, no matter the brand. I don't think that's true, and no one has shown me otherwise.
That said, I'm still open to convincing.
