Not quite sure why you picked a fight with me but... if that's what you want, I guess I'll play along.
Though I didn't know it at the time, I guess it's fair to say that 944 is yours. If you re-read my post, you'll notice I actually paid you a compliment. Obviously, being the type of guy who likes to pick fights (afterall, in addition to writing a post here you even sent me a PM!) you conveniently overlooked that. Fine.
I'm sorry if the 944 isn't the first (or even 30th) car that comes to mind during a "sports car" word association test. I never said the car was s***. (while you clearly put down the msp (on mazda board no less!) by saying it's NOT one of a kind and not a sports car. While I agree it's clearly no sports car, no one could ever convince me it's not one of the more unique cars on the road today. All that aside... girly???? (he wrote that in his PM to me) LMAO come on man!! that's just weak! The VW bug is girly and so is the ion... but the msp??? while it's no "muscle car" I'm not sure how you can call it girly... maybe that was just your way of trying to put me down. sorry to say, it only made me laugh.
Last but not least... i'm not sure where you're getting these facts from but you may need to whip them out of your ass for us. Again, no disrespect to the 944... it's actually one of my favorite porsches ever made. but to say it's comparable with the 911? To my knowledge, the FASTEST (and there were a bunch of chuggers made) 944 ever produced was the turbo S. Now I'm not trying to come across as a porsche afficianado (sp?) as you clearly are, but I'm 99% sure the 88 turbo s model did 60 in about 5.5 seconds or so... (while other years/trims were as much as 9 seconds) While I'm not aware of the top speeds for any of them, even if they COULD push a buck 80 like a 911... they clearly can't compete with it off the line. (to be fair, the 911 turbo s does 60 in 3.6 seconds)
If you have facts and figures to back up your claim, by all means. I don't mind being wrong. Just don't call my msp a girly car again.