- :
- 2019 CX-5 Signature
So based on 2020 CR Predicted Reliability ranking being #2, does this mean Cylinder deactivation/Rocker arm issue is rare and far in between?
Bingo!
So based on 2020 CR Predicted Reliability ranking being #2, does this mean Cylinder deactivation/Rocker arm issue is rare and far in between?
Yeah, but were discussing BRAND reliability rating from Consumer Reports the OP started with.Actually, CR gives the 2018 CX-5 their highest rating for reliability. It ties the 2018 Subaru Forester for reliability, is just a bit below the 2018 RAV4, and way better than the Hyundai Tucson. Owner satisfaction is way higher than the RAV4 and nearly the same as the Forester.Unfortunately the ranking keeps dropping since 2015, to #6, then to #12 in 2018.
Just ran into an old post in CX-9 forum and found the latest Consumer Reports Car Brands Reliability ranking. Unforyunatrly Mazdas reliability keeps dropping now its #12 dropped 6 spots from 2016! The brand reliability now is behind Honda、Hyundai、Nissan, the only one worse than Mazda among all Asian brands is Acura! I personally dont read too much into CR since they faked roll-over reports on Suzuki Samurai and Isuzu Trooper, but their reliability data is still the best collected from thousands of vehicle owners since 1960s. This also coincides my feeling on Mazdas quality and reliability during my almost 3 years of ownership on our 2016 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD. Im gradually losing confidence on our CX-5s longevity after many things in our CX-5 started falling apart. Before anyone jumping into conclusion that CR is not trustworthy on reliability data, in 2015 when we purchased our CX-5, the salesman proudly showed me the reliability ranking from CR, at that time Mazda was #4! And that was part of reason we made the purchase, and kept recommending it to friends and family.
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
Ranking the brands and showing their most and least reliable cars
![]()
View attachment 217979
Yeah, I can change it on wording *Actually, this is what you stated:
That has been proven inaccurate, so I'll leave it at that.
Speaking of reliability, I don't know how reliable CR is, they have Porche as #4 and Honda at #12. In general I think Mazda is making very reliable cars and the odds of getting a good one is high.
What makes you think those rankings are out of whack? Porsche makes nearly flawless cars, they just have expensive maintenance schedules. And it ain*t 2003 anymore - Honda is in a free fall in terms of reliability and several publications have taken notice. Go browse a Passport or CRV forum and you*ll see how much of a mess Honda has made lately.
You can't really compare a Mazda forum to a Honda one. Honda sells 3-4 times more vehicles than Mazda, so of course you're going to see more problems from owners.
If I went to an IPhone forum, I'm going to see more threads related to problems then lets say a LG forum.
You can't really compare a Mazda forum to a Honda one. Honda sells 3-4 times more vehicles than Mazda, so of course you're going to see more problems from owners.
If I went to an IPhone forum, I'm going to see more threads related to problems then lets say a LG forum.
You can't really compare a Mazda forum to a Honda one. Honda sells 3-4 times more vehicles than Mazda, so of course you're going to see more problems from owners.
If I went to an IPhone forum, I'm going to see more threads related to problems then lets say a LG forum.
Its weird how CR ranks the Mx-5 Miata as the most reliable car...then again its a very simple car (no cylinder deactivation, no turbo, ect.). The CX-3 is basically the same approach...simple....but now the CX-9? What the heck. It has every electronic and mechanical gizmo Mazda offers and turbo too. What is it about the CX-9 that the CX-5 and Mazda6 (or Mazda3 vs CX-3) can't do?
Its weird how CR ranks the Mx-5 Miata as the most reliable car...then again its a very simple car (no cylinder deactivation, no turbo, ect.). The CX-3 is basically the same approach...simple....but now the CX-9? What the heck. It has every electronic and mechanical gizmo Mazda offers and turbo too. What is it about the CX-9 that the CX-5 and Mazda6 (or Mazda3 vs CX-3) can't do?
I think the Mazda3 is projected as the least reliable because its the newest of the available models. It probably has some "growing pains" as the first MY of the redesign. The CX-9 was the same story in 2016 (quoted in yrwei52's post, #22 of this thread).
Also might be worth mentioning that the 3 is currently the only Mazda in the US that is not built in Japan (US-market 3s are built in Mexico). Take that for whatever it's worth.
I think the Mazda3 is projected as the least reliable because its the newest of the available models. It probably has some "growing pains" as the first MY of the redesign. The CX-9 was the same story in 2016 (quoted in yrwei52's post, #22 of this thread).
Also might be worth mentioning that the 3 is currently the only Mazda in the US that is not built in Japan (US-market 3s are built in Mexico). Take that for whatever it's worth.
Now how about the CX-3. I thought it was made in Mexico?