flat_black
Member
Extrude honing is extremely expensive, in my experience. Uugh.
igdrasil said:Actually the 626 mani will not flow as good as stock....
no benefits at all.
Even the ford probe manifold looks similar, same concept, bolts on the protege head and TB.
They are just long runners.
Captain KRM P5 said:if it is properly done (extrude hone, etc) by a machine shop, it can be very expensive
I was thinking the same thing, a ported stock manifold would flow much better.igdrasil said:Actually the 626 mani will not flow as good as stock....
no benefits at all.
Even the ford probe manifold looks similar, same concept, bolts on the protege head and TB.
They are just long runners.
i did a before and after dyno w/ the vtcs held open by a zip tie.Mike R said:It's a shame no one has dyno'd a VTCS removal on a stock intake...
********** said:Fellas,
Since you guys brought these similarities to my attention a few weeks ago, I personally have done a some research between the manifolds. The manifolds are not the same, similiar, but definately not the same. This is what I found out...
The SU IM has no VICS/VTCS systems or mounting holes for the flappers. All of the runner ports and the TB are smooth, there is no flange ridges like this 626 manifold pictured. These are two major differences that hinder airflow. The SU manifold is bolt-on and shows performance gains.
We actually had some people on this forum say that removing VICS/VTCS would lose top end power and some said there would be bottom end power loss. Well both were wrong, the dyno results showed positive gains throughout the entire powerband.
This is not a new topic, it goes back a few years. People have tried the 626 manifold and failed.
Bottom line here is that we have a similiar manifold, but not the same, and most importantly it fits and shows performance gains with out any problems. Thanks guys.
azian6er said:there is no vcts or vics on the manifold pictured, or even mounting holes. Also, the ports seem exactly the same to me.
Finally, what flange ridge are you talking about and how does that affect the performance of the manifold?
You are right about some people trying 626 manifolds and failing. However, they werent this manifold
-Bryan
********** said:Anything I say, you will protest it. You have always got something to say against me and the members here know it. When we spoke on the phone a few weeks ago, you proved to me that you are the whiney type, and your true goal was to start a flaming originally, and now it is again. Now if this is not true, please tell me what ever happened to the 626 manifold you order from some junk yard a few weeks back? You said you were going to put it on and dyno it... You talk alot yet haven't back it up...
jonlong said:Right, depending on the year of the 626 mani, some had VTCS and VICS, others did not. The 2000 626 mani does not have any signs of VTCS or VICS, holes, butterflies, flappers, etc... Also, I know that the stock protege mani has lips inside the runners which can be ported (I've done it). The 626 mani does not have those. **********, again, I am open-minded and willing to listen to what differences there are between the manifolds. But the differences you listed don't apply to a 2000 model-year 626 manifold.
********** said:Anything I say, you will protest it. You have always got something to say against me and the members here know it. When we spoke on the phone a few weeks ago, you proved to me that you are the whiney type, and your true goal was to start a flaming originally, and now it is again. Now if this is not true, please tell me what ever happened to the 626 manifold you order from some junk yard a few weeks back? You said you were going to put it on and dyno it... You talk alot yet haven't back it up...
********** said:Then we have different 2000 626 manifolds, I have one right here and it has the holes, butterflies, flappers, etc.
********** said:Then we have different 2000 626 manifolds, I have one right here and it has the holes, butterflies, flappers, etc.
jonlong said:this is how flame wars start.
Please, just explain what the differences are between the 626 manifold and yours. Once you do that, once you tell all of us why that manifold is $500 more, then all of this questioning will stop. Let's not bring up personal issues.