- :
- Central Virginia
- :
- 2019 CX-5 Reserve
I wanted to measure my MPG for a while before I switched to 93. So far I'm averaging 28 MPG.
You guys are killing me.
At about 5,000 miles and 93 octane, I'm at 24 MPG.
I wanted to measure my MPG for a while before I switched to 93. So far I'm averaging 28 MPG.
If you're cheap like me, use the Gasbuddy app when traveling long distances so you can avoid the overpriced stations. It's not going to save you any real money, but some stations charge way higher than market rates. I stick with name brand, top tier fuel.
I consistently get 1 MPG more out of 93 than I did out of 87. ...
You guys are killing me.
At about 5,000 miles and 93 octane, I'm at 24 MPG.
Just curious. Do both your 87 and 93 have the same Ethanol content? Some areas sell 93 with none, which would definitely help with MPG's.
Something must be wrong with your cx5. -mazdaforumlogic
Yup. It's being drive on the wrong roads and in the wrong atmospheric conditions. Damned factory tires!
On a serious note, I've wondered if an ECU tune might help my mileage.
I would not mess with a ecu tune until the warranty expires.
On a serious note, I've wondered if an ECU tune might help my mileage.
It definitely will, if you keep your foot out of it. (naughty)
These things run rich as hell from the factory (most cars do these days, especially turbos), so one of the easiest ways to make power is to lean it out a little. Probably make 20hp+ alone on a easy lean out and still keep it within a nice safety blanket.
As I've said, there is this 2 mile stretch of road when I put the car in Manual mode and engine-brake winding down into the gullies, and then leave it in 3rd gear as I scream my way back up the winding hills. It's crazy how these things accelerate when you're already at 3,500 RPMs.
If I had paddle shifters, I'd be whining about my 15MPG, 'cause they'd be right there and I wouldn't ever let the transmission shift itself.
Well they make a paddle shifter kit to ya know! Get on it!! (rockon)
My first car was 63 1/2 Ford Galaxie XL with a 427 cubic inch engine, 2 4 barrel carbs, and solid lifters. The mileage was 8 miles per gallon but gas was like .30/gallon.
As I've said, there is this 2 mile stretch of road when I put the car in Manual mode and engine-brake winding down into the gullies, and then leave it in 3rd gear as I scream my way back up the winding hills. It's crazy how these things accelerate when you're already at 3,500 RPMs.
If I had paddle shifters, I'd be whining about my 15MPG, 'cause they'd be right there and I wouldn't ever let the transmission shift itself.
I lived in that era too and had a 340 Plymouth 'Cuda with a huge 4 barrel carburetor. When you floored it you could literally see the gas gauge sinking to E. "Ethyl" was about .30 a gallon, so the fun was cheap.
The thing is "In the year 1960, the average retail price of gas in the U.S. was $0.31. This is equivalent to $2.65 in 2019 dollars." It's a lot cheaper now, since we get so much better mileage-- who woulda thunk. But maybe fun is more fun when you're young .
Love to see you say "ethyl". When I moved to Oregon [where you're not allowed to pump your own, unless you're a bike or special], I would pull up and say "fill it with high test", they'd say "with what?".
Back then the price didn't fluctuate daily either. It stayed at one price for the whole year or more. Plus they pumped your gas, cleaned your windows and gave you green stamps. Even check your oil if you wanted them to.
I*ve been alternating filling with non ethanol 89 which is about the same price as 93. The difference here between 87 and 93 is .60 to .70 a gallon.
had a quota to sell at least one quart of oil/tranny fluid for every 100 gallons of gas we pumped.