I'm not understanding this statement. He said he pulled on the srt4. Yet the srt4 is faster.
Here's part of car and driver's review on the MSP3
It didnt even after painting the pavement Bridgestone black with more than 30 hole shots. Working the shifter feverishly the low ratios in first and second mean two shifts happen before 60 mph we finally scorched a 5.8-second 0-to-60 time and a 14.4-second quarter-mile at 99 mph. The 156-hp Mazda 3 s wagon hits 60 in 7.4 seconds. The last WRX sedan we tested ran six flat to 60 with a 14.6-second quarter-mile and all four wheels digging [Cheap Speed, Round 23, C/D, September 2005]. Thats a difference worth knowing. We also did more than the usual stops from 70 mph, getting 167 feet, and circled a dusty, less-than-perfect skidpad to produce a brag-worthy 0.87 g.
Here's what they said about the SRT4
The '03 car ran to 60 mph in 5.6 seconds and cleared the quarter in 14.1 seconds at 102 mph. The '04 model nipped 0.3 second off the 60-mph sprint (5.3 seconds) and ran the quarter in 13.9 at 103 mph. Braking from 70 mph (169 feet), roadholding (0.86 g), and top speed (153 mph) were all about the same for both models.
From what I've read the MSP3 isn't going to do the job. Look at the skid pad and top speeds. To me the SRT4 is still tops, they should have lightend up the weight on the 3 if they really wanted it to be king.