HiBoost TS
Member
I was able to test both the GT28RS and the IHI VF22 turbos on the same car, at the same boost levels and with the same exhaust and engine. 26 more WHP on just the turbo.
I have a customer who was not happy with his upgrade in his VW Golf GTI turbo that came with a GT28RS. I told him to try the IHI VF22 that I use on many cars with 1.8 to 2.4 liter engines.
We fabricated a flange to adapt the IHI to the manifold and made a new flange to fit the downpipe.
The results are what I expected. I had tried the GT28RS on a customers car (MSP) and the difference in power was noticiable being greater in the car with the IHI.
In both dyno runs, the boost would go as much as 14 psi and then dropped to 10 psi. I think that is the way the ECU controls it. If it kept the boost, the difference could have been even larger.
It seems to be a little bit more lag with the IHI but that is because it is a 1.8 liter engine. That is not much an issue with the FS 2.0 in the Proteges.
Here is the dyno sheet.
I have a customer who was not happy with his upgrade in his VW Golf GTI turbo that came with a GT28RS. I told him to try the IHI VF22 that I use on many cars with 1.8 to 2.4 liter engines.
We fabricated a flange to adapt the IHI to the manifold and made a new flange to fit the downpipe.
The results are what I expected. I had tried the GT28RS on a customers car (MSP) and the difference in power was noticiable being greater in the car with the IHI.
In both dyno runs, the boost would go as much as 14 psi and then dropped to 10 psi. I think that is the way the ECU controls it. If it kept the boost, the difference could have been even larger.
It seems to be a little bit more lag with the IHI but that is because it is a 1.8 liter engine. That is not much an issue with the FS 2.0 in the Proteges.
Here is the dyno sheet.