Got Dyno'd

it says on the dyno sheet :udo,midpipe,catback,and intake
Haha... um, oops. Not used to seeing mods on dyno sheets. Well that does seem about right since numbers on Mustang dynos are typically a little lower than average. I guess that's what I was around back before I turbo'd it.
 
i like the fact that youre makin the same amount of horsepower and torque lol
i gotta get mine dynoed here pretty soon and get as much of a tune as possible. my mpg sucks too bad lol and the car runs like ass.
im ready to laugh at the numbers with just an intake lol
 
booo mustang dyno! Not trying to hate, but they're notorious for giving inflated numbers. That being said, I'm glad to see someone actually tracking their progress :)
 
What's a UDO?

I dyno'd 99whp on a Dynojet with my sportauto and a SRI, RB CBE, OBX header and UDP with 215/45/17 tires. I'm thinking a high flow catted mid-pipe will make a nice improvement. I'm working on my spare intake manifold as well- say bu-bye VTCS! Dyno to follow in the spring.........
 
booo mustang dyno! Not trying to hate, but they're notorious for giving inflated numbers. That being said, I'm glad to see someone actually tracking their progress :)
I always thought Mustang dynos were typically lower than dynojets? I thought it was those dynopacks (sp) things that just hook onto the wheel hub were the ones that gave high numbers? I dunno, I've only ever been to dynojets...
 
UDP, they seem to nejoy mispelling things. last name is roberts not roberti, lol.

You guys think an a/f controller would help my car out?

What's a UDO?

I dyno'd 99whp on a Dynojet with my sportauto and a SRI, RB CBE, OBX header and UDP with 215/45/17 tires. I'm thinking a high flow catted mid-pipe will make a nice improvement. I'm working on my spare intake manifold as well- say bu-bye VTCS! Dyno to follow in the spring.........
 
UDP, they seem to nejoy mispelling things. last name is roberts not roberti, lol.

You guys think an a/f controller would help my car out?

I just thought you were Italian!

And yes, something that can control fuel and timing would help immensely. Check out the NA Tech section.
 
Damn I still need to post up mine. 100.1whp 100.7 wtq on the same mustang dyno. Stock (ms axleback) 5-speed P5.

Mustang dyno's do read "lower" than dynojets, but give more realistic values.
 
Here is a clip of my car on the dyno

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JtsNGZgHuRA&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JtsNGZgHuRA&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
 
This is a Mazda site, but if we wanted to compair our other vehicles then I'd throw out my 1950 Chevy.

It has 355 hp and 405 trq

1950-Chevrolet-3100.jpg
 
I am always surprised at the low numbers the P5 puts down on the dyno even with a turbo. I might get mine run once I get back just to see the numbers.
 
When ever I get crap for the poor hp numbers I just tell people I can still kick their a$$ in the turns on stock vehicles!
 
I really don't think it's the engine more so the ECU. Sure it's got crap stock rods but the fact the ECU counteracts most mods doesn't help. I remember when I first got the car and put on a CAI it felt fast for about a week. The same when I removed the VTCS valves. At first I thought I was just getting used to the power but no, I'm pretty sure the ECU has something to do with it. It's a decent challenge to get much above 120 whp with N/A bolt-ons.
 
Back