FX45 vs. CX-7

Lantgeo

Member
Hey guys and ladies, just looking for a comparison between the two. I currently own a 2003 FX45 and am seriosly considering a CX-7. Most likely a GT with tech. I have FX with tech. I notice that their is no DVD player in back but thats about all the difference I see. For 26K cheaper, I dont think u can go wrong. The FX is faster but I can do without that. What do you guys think, should I trade. Do you think the mazda will be as reliable?
 
Unless I was SEVERELY worried about gas prices and running costs, I would say that the CX-7 is not even in the same league as the FX45. Maybe an FX35 or a well optioned Murano or something.

I would NEVER trade an FX45 for a CX-7

04-fx45-f3q-s.jpg


= Hotness.
 
Oh and I think that reliability would be about equal with the FX45 having the slight edge in fit and finish.
 
If you want to save money, I'd say why not. This car drives great, is well appointed for the money! People have seen it really love it and feel it looks more expensive than it is. Sure, it's not an FX 45 but if you are looking to save lots of money and get a cool, fun car this is it!! I am getting 21.5 mpg city right now so gas wise it's decent too!! The FX is a gas guzzler I imagine. The ride is way better than the Murano. Reliability is unknown at this point...it's new and may have a few issues along the way. I'd say it will be better than average though. I have had 2 Mazda's but none longer than 3 years and one a rotary engine and the rotary had some issues but the other ran perfectly. I think it's a good choice coming from the FX 45. Everyone has the Lexus 330!! The CX 7 is sporty plus a bit of luxury!
 
personally i'd never trade an infiniti in for any mazda, the other way around yeah of course, but infiniti for mazda nah
 
I think it is very hard to compare an FX45 and a CX7.A more
likely comparo would be an RDX or X3(I believe Motor Trend is having
this comparo next month)
 
buckeye#1 said:
I think it is very hard to compare an FX45 and a CX7.A more
likely comparo would be an RDX or X3(I believe Motor Trend is having
this comparo next month)


Okay guys, let me rephrase. Do you guys think that these vehicles are similar enough for me to "downgrade" to a cx-7. As for gas mileage, the FX sucks. averaging 16.7 miles per gallon 60% hwy and 40% city.
 
Sorry, but noone can really answer your question.

You simply need to drive one. I was able to take one for 24hrs to really test it.

The CX-7 has plenty of pep, and is fun to drive. It has it when you need it.

As for ride quality, the CX-7 is a "sport" ride. I'm 40, and have been used to rock-crawling Jeeps, so the CX-7 is plenty smooth for me. But it won't be as smooth as your current ride.

If you can sacrifice some comfort for a lot of money saved, then it might work for you.

See if you can get one for 24hrs.
 
Lantgeo said:
Okay guys, let me rephrase. Do you guys think that these vehicles are similar enough for me to "downgrade" to a cx-7. As for gas mileage, the FX sucks. averaging 16.7 miles per gallon 60% hwy and 40% city.
Similiar....they are two different price points......both similiar in design I guess. I am a fan of the FX...never drove one though. You need to go drive a top of the line one and that will answer your question....not sure what you are really looking for. You will get better gas mileage on the CX7, it may not have the power you want or ride. You need to drive one! Tell us more once you get in the driver's seat it would be an interesting comparison!!!! Good luck and have fun!!
 
cruzdreamer said:

Everyone has the Lexus 330!!

Oh Cruz, this is just TOO true.

During our week on Hilton Head, it is no exaggeration to say that nearly 1 out of every 7 or 8 vehicles on the road there is a Lexus RX 330. There are some very nice subtle colors available, but they are as COMMON AS GOLF CARTS down there - and I'm no golfer!

Someone else here commented on the awkward placement of the shifter in those hounds, and that is for sure, too.

We however, were the ONLY CX-7 on the road!
 
FX 45, no comparision. You are moving from an LUXARY car to a "more down to earth" car. I mean, it will work and run good and probably will enjoy it, but, with the infinity is in a class all by itself
 
pro00 said:
FX 45, no comparision. You are moving from an LUXARY car to a "more down to earth" car. I mean, it will work and run good and probably will enjoy it, but, with the infinity is in a class all by itself


well the infinity is way more luxurious but come on the mazda is gettng there !!!! i will say keep it but if is for money trade it for the cx-7 !!!! It is an awesome car!!
 
Cmon guys - whats this sucking up to (bow) Infinity?!?

I have CX7 (GT awd w tech) and my buddy has FX35 (wo tech but 20" rims and stuff) and he's willing to trade and pay me (glare)

Needless to say both cars not on sale here in Europe (shocked)
So compareing them here, would be based solely on the car itself - not some marketing BS (image) or dealership values etc.

Bottom line - make the change. **** that rebadged and overpriced NISSAN(gun)
 
Last edited:
Ok....I will go with that Dalton......Go for the CX 7 and why pay tons of money for an over priced Nissan beast!
 
Dalton said:
Cmon guys - whats this sucking up to (bow) Infinity?!?

I have CX7 (GT awd w tech) and my buddy has FX35 (wo tech but 20" rims and stuff) and he's willing to trade and pay me (glare)

Needless to say both cars not on sale here in Europe (shocked)
So compareing them here, would be based solely on the car itself - not some marketing BS (image) or dealership values etc.

Bottom line - make the change. **** that rebadged and overpriced NISSAN(gun)

Mistake #1 - You're comparing the wrong FX. The guy has an FX45 not a 35 and thats what he's comparing the CX-7 to.

Mistake #2 - Image counts. If it didn't, VW would have sold a million phaetons and people would not buy Mazda's because they share tons of parts with fords. But most people know that Mazdas IMAGE is that they produce affordable fun to drive cars for the masses which is why I love em.

Mistake #3, - While Infinitis are just the lex division of nissan, they cars, and yeas their dealerships are acut above. Trust me: I owned an infiniti and I worked at a nissan dealership. So I've have the experience from both sides.

Case in point. I'd take a G35 coupe over a 350Z anyday and I'd also take an M35 or M45 over a maxima anyday. Similar cars bt one's just a cut above.

So to reiterate. If you're looking for a more affordable ride and gas prices are hurting you then the CX-7 is the way to go. It seems to be an excellent vehicle. But if you think that a CX-7 is in anyway in the same league as an FX45, you're off your rocker!
 
Donas64 said:
Mistake #1 - You're comparing the wrong FX. The guy has an FX45 not a 35 and thats what he's comparing the CX-7 to.

Basically cant lie about my buddies ride, if he has FX35, then its hard for me to say he has 45 :)
For the price difference of the V8 version you can have two cars

Donas64 said:
Mistake #2 - Image counts. If it didn't, VW would have sold a million phaetons and people would not buy Mazda's because they share tons of parts with fords. But most people know that Mazdas IMAGE is that they produce affordable fun to drive cars for the masses which is why I love em.

Hehhee - i love Mazda for the reliability and "fun to drive" part and i drive CX7 because it's one of the kind here in Estonia (euro version will come next fall) - so that "masses" part really dont fly with me (glare)


Donas64 said:
Mistake #3, - While Infinitis are just the lex division of nissan, they cars, and yeas their dealerships are acut above. Trust me: I owned an infiniti and I worked at a nissan dealership. So I've have the experience from both sides..

AS an Infinity owner you still have to go nissan dealership here - so I was talking about car here- you can buy a Jugo for couple of $ and throw in some additional millions for sellers to book you an ad on 2007 SuperBowl halftime to tell you how great (2thumbs) your car is.(first)

Donas64 said:
Case in point. I'd take a G35 coupe over a 350Z anyday and I'd also take an M35 or M45 over a maxima anyday. Similar cars bt one's just a cut above.

So to reiterate. If you're looking for a more affordable ride and gas prices are hurting you then the CX-7 is the way to go. It seems to be an excellent vehicle. But if you think that a CX-7 is in anyway in the same league as an FX45, you're off your rocker!

Mostly i agree with you - but this is not a "money " issue also (glare)
crappiest gas you can buy here is 92 and mostly i use 98 wich costs about 1 per litre ( about 5$ per gallon) but i also drive a brand new 750 BMW (20" rims, nightvision etc) (burnout)

750BMW.webp

So, wich league am i?
 
Last edited:
tdf2001 said:
Let me guess, you are originally from Jgevamaa and you have someone from the Riigikogu in your back pocket. Nice choice of cars anyway...

I like my cars, thank you. :)

Anything beyound those two estonian (bowdown) words?
 
Drive a CX and decide after that. ;) It just begs you to find back road and rail on it.

As for reliablitly, no one really knows yet since it's new for this model year. Most first year models with any manufacturer have their teething problems but are usually ironed out quickly. There are a few TSB's thus far for minor annoyances but nothing major.
 
Dalton said:
Anything beyound those two estonian words?
Nah, unfortunately not, your post made me realize that I knew little about Estonia, so Wikipedia was my friend. How did you get the CX-7 to Europe so quickly?
 

New Threads and Articles

Back