the orracle
Member
First one may not be safe for work others are safe. Guess if you want to come out this tat will do it(boom07)
Are these stupid tattoos (NSFW)
- Thread starter the orracle
- Start date
the orracle
Member
RyanJayG said:
It's just a maze, crazy huh
65racecoupe
Member
- :
- Turbo (soon) Yellow 2002 P5
Those are the 4 worst tatoos ever.
The first one should be used in a bet. The loser of the bet has to get the first tattoo on his back or chest (better be a really big bet).
The first one should be used in a bet. The loser of the bet has to get the first tattoo on his back or chest (better be a really big bet).
that first one is the worst thing of all time.
- :
- 03 Protege ES 5spd
first one makes me sick, the rest are just dumb.
Hey it's their body they can have what ever they want tatooed on it, I've personally got a dragon across my right sholder blade and upper back, but the art work in the first one is not very good. He really should have found a better tatoo artist, it's really going to look like crap in a decade of so when it spreads more.
- :
- Das Pretzelwagon
We know of at least one person who does.winty87 said:
There is no coming back from the first one... Its like holding an international press conference on every news network known to man stating emphatically that you are "out." Not just a little "out," but all the way "out"...every time you take off your shirt...for the rest of your life.
R
R
pingdum said:
That is true. I doubt that there is another tattoo around that looks like it. However,but some decisions you live to later regret.
That first tat is so big that it would be hard to do anything with it in the future if: (i) he decided that they no longer wished to so graphically announce their sexual orientation; (ii) he wanted an opportunity (job, etc.) where such a depiction, were he to remove his shirt, would preclude him from the chance of being selected for that position; (iii) if he decided that he was bored of the imagery; (iv) if the imagery no longer meant anything to him (e.g. person depicted no longer a romantic interest, etc.); if he had an injury or surgery where the skin on his back was lacerated/abraded in such a way that the image no longer looked proper.
I have no problem with the image itself...to each his own...other than the fact that some images are closely tied with social judgements (e.g. a big ass swastika with the slogan, "Die n----r die" emblazoned underneath). This may be OK with the wearer of the tattoo. However, opinions, desires, feelings, and thoughs are fluid and can change over time. Tattoos are much less so...particularly something of that size and complexity. While your opinion might change over time, your label (figuratively and physically) might not be able to change to reflect the inner change.
If that brother is willing to live with that tat for the remainder of his life (or until he gets enough $$$ to have it covered/removed) more power to him. He is braver than I.
R
