Okay, let's take a look at the ten commandments in question. I use here the King James, Exodus 20:1-17, version with UK-style spelling of these divine laws, instructions, working rules, commands:
1. I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
First, this is a direct statement to the "children of Israel," not to everyone, and certainly not to Christians, or to non-Semites. Second, it appears to me that this indicates that it's alright to have gods other than Jehovah,/Yahweh/G_d/JHVH/whatever, just so long as he/it is Number One. And this isn't a religiously- biased belief structure? This is a published, posted, instruction that those in the state of Alabama must believe in the version of the Judeo-Christian god that Moore does! It's carved in stone!
2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
I'll not argue about the primitive and medieval geological and physical view of the world this expresses, but isn't the monument itself a "graven image"? I see there a distinctly graven monument that's not a natural formation and I also see, in churches all over the world, Baptist included crucifixes and other graven images. So everyone ignores this divine commandment? Note, too, that this deity we're afraid of here, is jealous and vindictive. He even reaches out to smite your children and grandchildren if you don't please him/it. He only "shews" any withholding of his wrath to those who read this notice, apparently. Is this any sort of document to publicly display before a family, much less offer it to them as a warning? As reader Joe Granski, from Virginia, observed:
Not only are we being told what we should worship, now we're being told, pretty explicitly, what we CAN"T worship, and what will happen if we don't follow this command, and what will happen to our children if we don't. Sounds like pretty cruel and unusual punishment to me (now... where have I heard that phrase before?). I guess Catholics, Hindus, and any other religion that uses statuary or images in their ceremonies are SOL.
Moving right along...
3. Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
This prohibits free speech. AND it's saying that we will be judged accordingly for violating this fairly irrational commandment. Keep in mind that this is in the STATE JUDICIAL BUILDING!
4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
To which Sabbath is this referring? From Friday dusk to Saturday dusk for Jews and Muslims? Or Midnight Saturday to midnight Sunday of Christians? Does this mean that government services will only get one day off a week? And which day? Is it now illegal to plow my field on the said Sabbath because god told my ox to take the day off? Notice also, that it directly references Genesis not only as fact, but as justification for this rule. Of course Genesis is the story of everybody's creation, so I guess it's non-denominational.
Of course, this whole don't-work-on-Sunday (or Saturday!) nonsense has been conveniently ignored by Christians and Jews (except for Orthodox Jews, and don't get me started on that, please!) and Muslims, because it's just not practical. It appears that we can conveniently ignore any of these commandments if they don't suit us, and maybe we don't believe the whole setup, anyway? In Toronto, there were "Sunday Blue Laws" enacted in 1976 that forbade us to go out to buy anything that wasn't absolutely necessary medicines, basic foods (but no fripperies such as candy bars!), crutches, Bibles, were exempted. Some of that is still in effect, indicating that Canada has a way to go to catch up with the rest of the world.
5. Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Here we have this blatant threat again: Do this or I'll kill you Gotta love the OT god... such a tantrum throwing little b****.
Sounds reasonable, if we ignore the firing squads, the electric chairs, the gallows, the lethal injections, that is. Another subject not to get me started on...
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery
Let's get real, folks. This text was written at a time when "adultery" meant sexual contact with a married woman, an engaged woman, or a virgin who was not the adulterer's wife. Sex with other females was not included, because establishing the paternity of any offspring was the motive; it was a civil matter, not a criminal one. As Mr. Granski points out, a deflowered virgin had a much lower "value" on the bridal market, and the punishment was payment equal to the loss of value. Life is complicated...
Well, okay. But a little fudging on taxes, or including an old dent on the auto insurance claim, shouldn't lead to immersion in brimstone, I'd say. But I'm no authority on such matters.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Question: does this one include gossip? If so, Hell's going to be crowded. In civil law, there's already a set of rules in place, with serious penalties for slander, libel, perjury, etc., but I don't think we need any worse experience than going through the court system, thank you. I'll take brimstone.
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
Oh boy. Here we go. It seems that merely wanting to have something belonging to a neighbor, can bring on damnation. "Covet" shows up in Webster's as, "To desire wrongfully, inordinately, or without due regard for the rights of others," but that's not getting what you want, it's just desiring it! The Oxford Dictionary gets a little more graphic, one meaning of "covet" stated as, "To desire with concupiscence or with fleshly appetite." That's more than I want to know.
But seriously, such a commandment posted in a government building dedicated to the law, simply tells the reader that, officially, he must not want anything that isn't already his! At this point, Moore is trying to dictate the thoughts of the citizenry. Thinking, wondering, fantasizing, imagining, are all part of being human. Moore wants thought control, which he'd see if he'd spend a few moments unblinded by the zeal that has dazzled him and led him to be such a self-righteous laughing-stock.
In the next chapter of Exodus, about which Moore apparently knows or chooses to know nothing, we find further rules which allow fathers to sell their daughters into slavery (21:7) and we're told that "whoever curses his father or his mother shall be put to death" (21:17). Those commandments are not included among the Ten Commandments that Moore placed under the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court building. Why not? In his legal decisions, does Moore use this kind of selective thinking to make his rulings?
Moore has argued that his installing the monument was "a way to honor the biblical underpinning of America's laws." That's not valid. The Constitution doesn't claim to be "under God"; the Preamble simply alleges that inalienable rights come from a "creator." The commandments which prohibit worshipping other gods and require that one honor one's father and mother, aren't reflected in our U.S. laws, at all. And as pointed out above, some US laws are in direct opposition to the Ten Commandments, e.g. capital punishment.
As a nation currently struggling with its credibility and its image on the world stage, we certainly didn't need this ridiculous scene to be played out publicly. I'm personally embarrassed by Justice Moore's stance, his actions, and his ignorance of reality, since they reflect on my country. He committed what he knew was an improper act arguably an illegal act then openly and flagrantly violated a federal court order to reverse that action, and he has shown no remorse, nor discomfort. In fact, he's crowing and preening in the spotlight that he's brought to bear on his actions. The ethics complaint that was brought against him stated that he failed to "observe high standards of conduct" and to "respect and comply with the law." And this is the Chief Justice of the State of Alabama?
I must give ample credit to those who supplied much of what I've summarized here. Readers Jim Kutz and Joe Granski, among others, shared their thoughts with me. In fact, I'll let Joe close this discussion with his queries he asks about "God's Top 10 Ways to Stay Out of Hell":
http://randi.org/jr/090503.html
First of all, in what way does the state acknowledging God, not violate separation of church and state? Last I checked, believing in a god was the expressed domain of religion. Are atheists and agnostics recognized by the state only as godless savages, and therefore, not as deserving of unbiased legislation? Can the citizens of Alabama believe in anything they want to, so long as they believe in a god?
well our great leader has answered this one!!! And excuse me, what if the state represented Hispanics in a biased fashion when they are the majority in America? What if it the teachings of Buddha.. or (gasp!).. messages from the Koran? If the judge believed in it.. it should be ok right? Or how about if the judge believed in homosexual superiority? Maybe that would be more suitable to your liking. He is not supposed to be a judge of moral character and religious/philosophical beliefs. He has his own private time as a citizen to express those as he wishes, when hes on that bench, he represents America and the laws of this country.. Not god first, not Buddha or Krshna first, not the whites first, not men first. America first!
I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God." - George Bush
And this folks, is the Christian agenda. Its called.. get on the bandwagon.. or we dont give a **** about you. No matter if you fought and died for this country, no matter how much you pay in taxes.