With or without engine cover?

jurgs01

Member
:
2006 Tacoma
What do you guys think? With or without engine cover? I like it with, but it's a shame to cover up those nology wires. (56K warn on the pics).
 

Attachments

  • manifold1.webp
    manifold1.webp
    330.8 KB · Views: 350
  • manifold2.webp
    manifold2.webp
    305.4 KB · Views: 287
  • manifold3.webp
    manifold3.webp
    335.4 KB · Views: 330
  • manifold4.webp
    manifold4.webp
    324.6 KB · Views: 303
I say you go without and then give the DG cover to me. :D

ha ha

But seriously, I like it with the cover on.
 
Polish the valve cover than leave off the engine cover. Man thats a nice looking engine bay either way, love that exhaust manifold.
 
BlkZoomZoom said:
Polish the valve cover than leave off the engine cover. Man thats a nice looking engine bay either way, love that exhaust manifold.

Coming from you that's a real compliment. I have heard you praise maybe ten things since I've been a member:)

BTW, I got that problem fixed that I was PMing you about. It turned out that the starter was turning but not putting out enough torque to start the motor. Dunno why I was getting no spark? I figured it out when I bump started it and it started right up. Obviously not an ignition problem. The starter motor is in a terrible place to get at. If anyone has to change theirs out it is a PITA for something with only three bolts a plug and a ground.

And finally I am going to keep the engine cover. Thanks for all the opinions. I am going to install an EBC and S-pipe/J-pipe replacement this summer and run it at 9psi for a dyno. I have been getting a lot of requests to do that with the stock turbo and SMIC to see the possible gains. I want to mess around with my MPI a bit before I do that. Should give a good estimate for those looking to get around 230-240 WHP (hopefully crosses fingers) in a still reliable car.
 

New Threads and Articles

Back