2014 CX5 2.5 fuel econ horrible

^ I don't beleive they count capacity of the filler neck in the fuel tank size. You are brave running it down that low.
 
Second fill up @ 4 miles to empty on the range meter gave me 392 miles on this tank. When I filled it up it once again it stopped filling at around 13 gallons, but I kept topping it off until it climbed all the way to 15.8 gal !!! I thought the tank size was 14.8 (for FWD). What gives???

Fill slower once you reach the 10-12 gallon mark and you won't have this issue as dramatically.
 
You are brave running it down that low.

According to some posts above, there should be ~50 miles (2 gallons) left when the range meter gets to 0. I wasn't concerned.

Fill slower once you reach the 10-12 gallon mark and you won't have this issue as dramatically.

Thanks, I did follow your tip this time but it didn't seem to help. Kind of troubling that it says it's full but you can really put up to 3 additional gallons after that. Will bring it up to the dealer...
 
According to some posts above, there should be ~50 miles (2 gallons) left when the range meter gets to 0. I wasn't concerned.
Thanks, I did follow your tip this time but it didn't seem to help. Kind of troubling that it says it's full but you can really put up to 3 additional gallons after that. Will bring it up to the dealer...

909648-nintendo_donkey_kong_country_2_gba.jpg
 
I have a few friends that are mechanics and another that works at a warranty company and there's a direct correlation between in-tank fuel pump failures and running the tank low. It's damn hot here in the summer.

And it's not fuel you're never going to use on a sky active engine, it's a reserve to prevent you going to the dealer and paying for re-bleeding the high pressure fuel system.

You can do what you like... it's only money.

I have friends that are mechanics as well and they all disagee and say with a modern car the 1/4 tank urban legend is ridiculous. Fuel flowing through the pump cools it. No vehicle engineer is going to design a part that will fail when used under normal conditions then tell their customers "welp, shoulda kept'er above 1/4 tank cause I designed that pump to be sub-par!".

Believe anything you want but spreading misinformation does a disservice to others.
 
I have friends that are mechanics as well and they all disagee and say with a modern car the 1/4 tank urban legend is ridiculous. Fuel flowing through the pump cools it. No vehicle engineer is going to design a part that will fail when used under normal conditions then tell their customers "welp, shoulda kept'er above 1/4 tank cause I designed that pump to be sub-par!".

Believe anything you want but spreading misinformation does a disservice to others.

Typical fuel injected cars have around 80psi $70 fuel pump. An 80psi pump won't be hurt running dry.

The direct injected CX-5 runs a 150psi $150 in-tank pump into a 1000psi $600 fuel pump. The 1000psi fuel pump would most likely be damaged if it ran dry. At $600, I'll make sure I never run low on gas in the CX-5.
 
Last edited:
Typical fuel injected cars have around 80psi $70 fuel pump. An 80psi pump won't be hurt running dry.


I guess it depends on what you mean by 'hurt'. All fuel pumps I'm familiar with have impelloers that are lubricated with the fuel flowing through them. Running them dry will cause rapid wear on the contact areas of the impeller. They are not designed to be run without fuel in them.

The direct injected CX-5 runs a 150psi $150 in-tank pump into a 1000psi $600 fuel pump. The 1000psi fuel pump would most likely be damaged if it ran dry. At $600, I'll make sure I never run low on gas in the CX-5.

I make sure I never run out of fuel. But running low is not a problem.
 
Typical fuel injected cars have around 80psi $70 fuel pump. An 80psi pump won't be hurt running dry.

The direct injected CX-5 runs a 150psi $150 in-tank pump into a 1000psi $600 fuel pump. The 1000psi fuel pump would most likely be damaged if it ran dry. At $600, I'll make sure I never run low on gas in the CX-5.

The issue was not "running a tank dry" it was someone telling mistruths about how your car will be damaged if it is run with a 1/4 tank of fuel or less.

A modern car will not be damaged if you frequently use 90+% of the fuel in your tank before refilling.

To go around telling people it is harmful to use more than 3/4's of a tank of fuel is ridiculous.
 
You know how to prevent from running out of gas? Fill up at 1/4 tank...

It's not rocket surgery!

You can't predict what's going to happen out on the road so give yourself some extra padding. It took me 6 hours to make a 2 hour trip once and I'm sure glad I wasn't already pushing the tank to empty. Granted that car wasn't direct injected but stranded is stranded.
 
I have no issues following Mazda's recommendation of filling the fuel when it gets to ~ 1/4 tank. As brandini said it is not rocket science. Life has enough Speed Bumps without me creating more, just to challenge the recommendations. :-))
 
You know how to prevent from running out of gas? Fill up at 1/4 tank...

Another method that is equally effective is to fill up any time before the pump starts sucking air.

For example, you will never run out of fuel if you always top off the tank every hour of driving. Or, if you always fill up when you have at least a quart of useable fuel left you will never run out of fuel. There is no hard and fast rule as to a fuel level that triggers a fuel-up as long as it is done before the pump sucks air. It really depends upon where you are going and what your schedule is. I've filled up a few times when I was only 1/2 - 2/3 empty because I knew I would otherwise need to drive out of my way to purchase fuel. It depends upon where you are going.

You can't predict what's going to happen out on the road so give yourself some extra padding. It took me 6 hours to make a 2 hour trip once and I'm sure glad I wasn't already pushing the tank to empty.

True, you always need some extra fuel for padding for the unexpected. The question under discussion is how much padding is needed to avoid running out of fuel. And that is different for each person and each circumstance. Obviously it makes no sense to fill up every time at 1/4 tank with over 100 miles remaining regardless of how many gas stations are on your route.

This is more true than ever with the exceptional idle efficiency of the CX-5 (in case of an unexpected traffic jam).

Because I track my MPG I am automatically alerted if a fuelling station pump shuts off before my tank is full. The giveaway is if my manually calculated MPG is more than one MPG higher than the MPG indicated on the trip computer. In that instance I will not push my range to the limit. But, with a tank filled to normal full there is always a couple of gallons left when the trip computer says "0 miles to empty". In my most common driving scenarios, that is all the buffer I need and I have no problem driving a few miles after it reads "0 miles to empty".
 
This is getting frustrating. I have now stopped overfilling my tank, and the calculated gas mileage based on odometer jumps to 29+ (great!), but I am having a very hard time believing this since the computer readout is still showing 25mpg. The 25mpg is consistent with the value I would get if I top off my tank another 2+ gallons like I was doing before.

I think it's time for a call to the dealer. I don't think it's normal that I can fill up another 2 gallons after the pump auto-shut off feature engages. From what I read about over-filling, it can cause damage to the car, but I really don't think I'm overfilling when there is TWO+ GALLONS of extra "capacity".

Can anyone verify how many gallons a typical fill up is for them, when you fill up at "0 miles to empty", and not over-fill after auto-shut off?
 
Isn't 25MPG the EPA mileage? Not sure what you're so upset about. It's what I've been averaging with warmer weather and no snow to deal with.

Also, on board mileage is calculated by wheel rotation. It's really just a ball park way to monitor your driving habit and efficiency. Have you tried a GPS app to track your mileage? For some it can be off by a noticeable amount.
 
it looks like some cx-5 engines performing well and others performing very bad. Mine 2014 2L is 13L/100Km now where as there are cx-5s with 9-10L/100Km on the same roads. Can it be the driving - I do not believe so, I drove very aggressively, quick startups, braking, overtaking, the average goes up by few points. Therefore I believe that there is some technical issue that Mazda has to solve for us.
 
Also, on board mileage is calculated by wheel rotation. It's really just a ball park way to monitor your driving habit and efficiency. Have you tried a GPS app to track your mileage? For some it can be off by a noticeable amount.

You've got that in reverse, wheel mileage is pretty darn accurate unless you've changed the wheels. You can test it by doing an odometer run between mile markers.
 
Isn't 25MPG the EPA mileage? Not sure what you're so upset about. It's what I've been averaging with warmer weather and no snow to deal with.

Also, on board mileage is calculated by wheel rotation. It's really just a ball park way to monitor your driving habit and efficiency. Have you tried a GPS app to track your mileage? For some it can be off by a noticeable amount.

I'm not upset about the actual number. I am just trying to make sense of the gross mismatch between measurement methods, and the fact that when I overfill the tank, it matches what the computer is saying. When I take the advice from this forum to not overfill, I get inflated MPG numbers. Which is correct?

Also, the fact that I can overfill by 2+ gallons, doesn't seem right. That's an extra ~50 miles of range per tank...
 
Took delivery 05/24. First fillup 06/03 @ 327 miles (about an eighth of a tank indicated remaining). Stopped when the nozzle shut off (I've totally stopped trying to top off). Fuel used = 11.273g which computes to 29.01 mpg. Took delivery of the car w/3 miles on the odometer so the tank was filled at the dealership at that point. All in-town driving. Price was $3.599/gal but got a double coupon discount making the final price $3.459.

Will fill up again tonight because we had to make a run north and back - all freeway use. 2nd tank figures will be posted when I return home.

EDIT for 2nd tank: 28.39mpg on a ~300 mile freeway dash at 70mph.
 
Last edited:
I took delivery of my 2014 2.5 GT AWD at the end of February. Initially I was getting 11.8 L / 100 kms (19.93 MPG). I've since modified my driving habits (learning how to coast in gear, no heavy startups, no heavy braking, etc)....and now with the warmer weather....I've got it down to 10.4 L / 100 kms (22.62 MPG). Not a fantastic increase in mileage....but I'll take it. I still love the vehicle and I'm hoping my mileage will get better with time.

By the way, here is a website for conversion (L/100 KM to MPG):

http://www.convertworld.com/en/fuel-consumption/Liters+per+100+km.html

Bon
 
I don't know if my cx5 2.5 awd is defective. ..or if I'm lucky..so far first 3 tanks 32 mpg. 27mpg and another 32. Mine is mostly highway. I'm happy
Edit..this is actual mileage calculated at the pump..not the on board estimated

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
Greetings,

My AWD CX-5 has been doing 28MPG in 40/60 HWY Traffic driving. 2500 miles.

Also, even with 1 gallon of gas left in the tank, the pump will not suck any air.
 
Back