I test drove one the other day, I have the '21 NA cx5 and it was a turbo cx50. It felt much bigger and more brawny when looking out from the drive and the windows seemed much smaller. Headroom was fine with the seat lowered (6'2) but noticably less than the cx5 where there's plenty for me. Didn't really notice a big difference in width of the front space. The seats kinda felt more comfy, the arm rests were nice. The fit and finish seemed just as good as the cx5. I like the simpler style of the cx5, where the cx50 has a little more design which is cool too. The drive smoothed out bumps much much more than the cx5 which I loved, but it felt slightly less viscerally connected to the road. It still took corners like a mazda though. Also, the steering took less movement for the same turn than the cx5, which felt a little less fun but smoother.Anyone with any seat time in the CX-50 who has a CX-5, maybe specifically from a CX-5-Turbo? Size and fit compared to the CX-5?
I should have clarified further that I'm absolutely fine with my 2019 CX-5 drivers seat, but the CX-50 seat feels ever better to me, whether that's due to redesign or just being "virgin" seats, or both And, the 2019 is head and shoulders above my previous 2016 front seats. I think that one didn't have the lumbar adjustment, which is always key for me.I like the comfy couch feeling I get when I'm driving (the seats are fine for me and didn't know how the 50 compares
The front cabin I felt definitely looks and feels wider than the CX-5--more clearly rectangular, if you will, due to the lower headroom. And while dimensions-wise it is physically wider, visually it looks even more wide than the 5 because of the different proportions. The less cluttered dashboard design (less prominent/more incorporated middle vent) probably also contributes to that impression.Does the front cabin seem the same, side-to-side?