Zodiac Changes

[speedracr79]

So anyone hear about this some scientist says were not what we think we are something about the plant being off its axis so its not lined up so the constilatuons are off or some crap like that...its says im a taurus which is "bull" pun intended ...im a GEMINI so what you think of this...

 

[sanblaster]

I like that scorpios only land on 6 days now. that is effed up, i don't believe anything astrologers or whatever say anymore. they also mentioned that pluto wasn't a planet either. they can all get bent.

 

[stkmp5]

I read somewhere that it was only for people born after 2009.

 

[NRRfrogmanP5]

^^^ yes sir.. you are correct

 

[Goliat6288]

I like that scorpios only land on 6 days now. that is effed up, i don't believe anything astrologers or whatever say anymore. they also mentioned that pluto wasn't a planet either. they can all get bent.

pluto isnt a planet. its a comet that got caught by the suns gravity and stayed orbiting it.

yeah i heard the same. where does it say what sign you really are? im curious on what it says i am now.

 

[sanblaster]

pluto isnt a planet. its a comet that got caught by the suns gravity and stayed orbiting it.

 

[Goliat6288]

lol

 

[RacerXGirl]

Most Westerners use the tropical zodiac as the means of determining their sign...it has to do with the seasons; the sidereal zodiac – which is fixed to constellations and is what most people in the East follow is where your sign may have changed. Ptolemy in the 2nd century is the one responsible for setting the tropical zodiac standard. So if you were a Scorpio before, you're still a Scorpio.

 

[Trv89]

Apparently the truth has not been told yet by the media...

The TRUTH, is that there is NO NEW zodiac sign.

we are still the same sign. The astrologist "discovered" that the sun barely intersects the path of the new Zodiac Constellation Ophiuchus, but the intersection is so minuscule that it is not going to be a new sign, there are 12 months, so 12 signs, and everyone has been buying into this crackpot astrologist...who just wants to make his "scientific mark"

here is a good explanation:

Ophinicus is a constellation, and it might be located in the zodiac band, but it is NOT part of the zodiac system. Why? Because it collapses it! Ophinicus has no opposite sign, and no planet that rules it, also, the sign has no house it can be ruled by. The zodiac signs CANNOT be a prime number, and all elements have to have an equal amount of signs. so unless there is a 16th sign, there cannot be a 13th. Also, what element is it ruled by? None. Therefore, it can't be considered part of the zodiac. Each element has a mutable, fixed, and cardinal sign, Ophinicus is not considered any of these, so unless two new zodiac signs and a new element pops up (plus, you have to fit them under a fixed, mutable, and cardinal category) Ophinicus cannot be part of the zodiac.