he is just jealous that gas out there in CA costs 2X as much as gas else whereTopher said:geez, zmepro...a little harsh today, don't ya think?
he is just jealous that gas out there in CA costs 2X as much as gas else whereTopher said:geez, zmepro...a little harsh today, don't ya think?
(rofl) true trueDragonEye said:he is just jealous that gas out there in CA costs 2X as much as gas else where
Pete, I hope you realize that once you go synthetic, you shouldn't go back. I don't know how many miles you have on our P5 but just make sure your engine is well broken in with regular petro-based motor oil before you switch to synth. By the way, switching to synth oil won't help much with performance either. It just doesn't break down (lose its viscosity) like petro motor oil when you race your engine a lot. It doesn't mean you can run longer with synth oil either. You still should change your oil at regular intervals.Pete47 said:So are yous guys suggesting that I should still lower my fuel down to 87 again?I gotta fill up my car soon and what I'll do is try this 87 out 2 more times just to get it in there and see what happens. What I hear in my car is a little tick tick tick... I also started to use Mobil 1 synth 10-30 to see if I can get that little tick out. THe only way it leaves is when I pit higher ocatin.
Q.? My fiance has a 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer ES auto, and it has around the same power and same performance as our MP5. Why does here owners manual recommend 89oct if she doesn't at a higher compression ratio. (scratch)
This just boggles my mind. Just out of curiousity, what do you hope to gain with running anything higher than 87 octane?ChopstickHero said:87 when gas is expensive... 91 when gas is cheap!
YelPro03 said:This just boggles my mind. Just out of curiousity, what do you hope to gain with running anything higher than 87 octane?
Pete, a higher octane gas does not make it a better gas than a lower octane one. That seems to be the root of all this misconception here. People love their cars, as do I, so they try to give it the best they can afford. I don't blame them for that. However, giving your car something that it is not designed to use is not doing it any good. I'm taking off my engineer hat and just using some basic logic here. The P5, or any other car designated by the manufacture to use 87 octane, is designed, tested, proofed out, and approved to use 87 octane. This is the manufacture telling me this. The same people who have a reputation to uphold and are liable for any damage done from faulty design, recommendation, etc., so it is in their (Mazda in this case) best interest to recommend what they think is best for the car that their engineers designed. Not to flash my resume here but with a masters degree in engineering, I'm not going to pretend to know more or second guess Mazda engineers on what is best for the car and engine they designed. Now, if you feel that your car's engine "sounds" better (not necessarily performs better) with higher octane, then there might be something wrong with it. Again, I'm not going to pretend to be an expert but just using some logic here, if the engine is not sounding right using the manufacture recommended fuel then there has to be something wrong and it deserves to be looked at. Now there's another thing, you said you bought it used so I guess you never heard what the engine sounded like when it was new. So given that fact, what are you basing what the engine should sound like on? Maybe, just maybe, it should sound like that. And if that's the case then putting higher octane fuel in a perfectly good engine to delay the detonation to make it sound like what you think it should sound like might actually do damage. Going back a few steps now.. assuming that engine does not in fact sound right and using higher octane does make it sound like it should, then aren't you just masking the root of the problem? You're not fixing the problem. You're just putting a band aide on what is causing the problem to begin with. It's like putting a tape over the "Check Engine" light. If you don't see it then there's no problem. Just some thoughts here. Take it for what it's worth.Pete47 said:let me try some better gas to see if it goes away, so I put a higher octain.
I did the same thing I notice there was no pinging either so I just stuck with 89.Pete47 said:I just recently changed from 87 to 89 and I noticed that my car dosen't ping anymore. I wrote a thread on this forum called Please try this Fuel test. I noticed that my car runs better at a higher octain. When I brought the car (a month and a half ago) I was using 93 and I found this forum, I wrote a thread and asked what octain should we be using and noticed that everyone stated 87, so I tried it. I noticed my car had a funny pinging noise so I just recently up-ed it to 89 and still testing on what's happening.
So far my car is not pinging and I lost some vibrations that I felt with the car on 87. My car is auto 2002 MP5 I hope this helps. (bird)
That's great. I'm happy for you. I hope the extra 50-75 KM you get is worth the extra cost in getting higher octane fuel.andyfatsax said:Ever beat a dead horse with a stick? Well you have now. I drive my car 100km everyday, same route, everyday, I could do it with my eyes closed. What i am saying is I have tested out different octane fuels on this same route a bazzillion times. 92 gives me better mileage...I mean like 50-75 more KM per tank. Over 5000 RPM there is more power to red line...the variables have been tested in several cars on the same route all with different results. Yes I am taking this back to the grade 6 science fair.
It doesn't matter what your theory is, I have done a real test and these are my results. Not saying it will work for every P5 owner but since I drive my car soooo much I notice every little mild change that occurs including tiny increases in power.
89, using the cheapest stuff just never feels right.Khoifather said:87, 89, 93???
adc0642 said:Supposedly it should run fine on 87, which is what i use and have never had a problem. But I used to work at an oil refinery and can tell you the higher-octane stuff almost always has more good additives in it. BTW, the refinery makes something like 120octane, then basically dilutes it to get lower octanes. the oil is refined to the same amount.
Those of you using 89 or 92 for metter mileage might wnat to do a cost comparison: if you get 1-2 more mpg (about 7% better) is it worth 20-30cents/gallon extra? (13-19% extra based on the $1.56/gal i filled up with yesterday)
andyfatsax said:Yes this is true but I pay extra for more power and higher octane fuel = more power!(fuoops)
yea it does. if you get better gas mileage and you get better high end performance then yes it is betteruclap5 said:no it doesnt.