if you pick up one from a non-ABS car it'll work in anything.
Good point.
if you pick up one from a non-ABS car it'll work in anything.
Ugh... just got my first speeding ticket in the MSP. Dude had someone pulled over on a back road near my house. I slowed down, went by him, and then accelerated back up to speed. Well apparently he decided to stop writing that ticket, stick his radar gun out the window and "claims" he got me doing 64 in a 35. He then finished writing the dude he had pulled over the ticket, called my house to see if I was here (I had just pulled in and my mom answered the phone) and came over to give me a ticket. WTF?! ******* cop with an empty ******* life!
So of course I asked to see the radar gun or some proof that he got me going that fast. He said he couldn't, but he wasn't in the business to "make things like that up." Needless to say I'm gonna take it to court, but it pisses me off that this guy was on such a personal vendetta to give me a ticket.
At least now I can say I've been pulled over in my own driveway...
if they cant show you the radar gun for proof then they cant give you a ticket.
you should easily win that in court. law states that the radar gun can remember the last speed it recorded, so they should be able to show you. if they cant then there is no legal ticket they can give you.
not entirely true, you could still get "unreasonable and imprudent speed" (law name varies from state to state) which is essentially a judgement call by the cop.
All that counts is what is written on the ticket... From what it sounds, I have a lot going for me in this situation. If nothing else, I'll go for probation before judgment and it'll all be good anyways
I'm pretty sure the statement that a laser or radar gun having to be used head on is a common myth. I did a little searching on the subject and couldn't find any references in regards to whether laser guns used on traffic moving away from the officer are invalid. As for the cop going to your house; I'm also pretty sure that as long as he says he's sure it was you driving the car (and therefore committing the offense in his presence), then he can issue the citation wherever he likes. He simply has to witness the infraction, but the citation can be issued when he has the ability to do so. Not trying to rain on your parade, just trying to play devil's advocate![]()
IIRC, you have to be coming towards the radar gun at the time of the cop lasing your car in order for the cop to get an accurate reading while lasing the front of your car. According to your post, you already passed the cop when he lased your car. So, the way I understand it, you passed the cop so he would have had to lase your car from behind as you were driving away from him. That doesn't give an accurate reading on a radar gun unless there is something I don't understand. and I would take that to court too. I have never heard of a cop going to someone's house to issue a ticket. If that's the case, every state law enforcement agency should send a squad car to everyone's house to issue random tickets because Im pretty sure a majority of each state population has driven over the speed limit at some point in their lives. I call it a complete BS ticket, he didn't pull you over so it should be dismissed
Lasing a car can be done from either the front or the rear. That's why full jammers also include rear sensors. I also know this because a cop gave me a ticket once, laser from the rear and showed me the gun. Reading was accurate.
The only reason they usually do it from the front is because it's easier, they can pull you over quicker, and in some jurisdictions it states that you have to be able to see the speed trap. And the biggest reason is, you gotta be pretty blind not to see a speed trap and slow down, so usually they won't lase you from behind...