Videos! CP-E HKS BOV kit with prototype short ram intake

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brian MP5T said:
Only In Snow...

Never on Pavement...

From a dig or From a Roll...

I doubt the SUV could run 14.5, Nevermind 13.0

Anything can run 13.0 if somebody wants to waste the time and money. Thanks for your quality input to our forum.
 
this is too funny....:D i love the cx7, drove one at zoom zoom live, lot's of fun and handled real well...i have an explorer now and this would be my next suv (or maybe the 9?)
 
Last edited:
Brian MP5T said:
Only In Snow...

Never on Pavement...

From a dig or From a Roll...

I doubt the SUV could run 14.5, Nevermind 13.0


Can you hang with 9.10?
 

Attachments

  • 2003_0216Image0016.webp
    2003_0216Image0016.webp
    363.8 KB · Views: 213
  • scoop1.webp
    scoop1.webp
    29 KB · Views: 206
Aricjm15 said:
This place started as a Protege forum well before your car was even drawn onto a pad of paper. The Cx-7 is just a small portion of this site, so infact this forum always has and always will be a Protege forum over everything else.

Yeah and I owned a Protege when I joined. Also a 2004 Mazda 3, 2006 Mazda 3, 2004 Mazda 6, and 2007 CX-7, so what's your point?
 
Test drove a Black Cherry Mica CX-7 on saturday. Very impressed. For an SUV it's an excellent highway runner and while I would not call it a corner carver, it's more than capable of holding it's own. Rush of the turbo is not as prnounced as I thought it would be though. It feels like an NA car but it was definalty quick enough for my wife and I. Congrats CX-7 owners. Nice steed indeed!

P.S: I'm a P5 owner so please don't rake me over the coals!
 
smo0f said:
brian has earned the right to be an ass whenever and to whomever he wants.

I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on that one.

Awesome P5? Yes!

Right to start a flamewar and stir up trouble? Nope!
 
I notice this clown has invaded some other threads in the CX-7 section now. I find it really hilarious that a 13 sec. P5 is considered the s***!!(lol)

I've owned 1/2 dozen cars over the last 15 years that would destroy a 13 sec car. 13 sec. is nothing, in the crowds I hang in 13 sec is considered peppy. Really hilarious that this punk thinks his P5 is anything other than a waste of money. For the amount he's probably wasted to get this car to 13.0 he could have bought a real sports car. Nothing against P5's, I used to drive one, but all they are is a good handling little econo car, nothing to brag about IMO.
 
Brian MP5T said:
This thread is Pure GOLD...

I read from start to finish and couldn't stop giggling...


Dudes and Dudetts, the entire thing started for me here on this forum for a couple of simple reasons

1. The Stock Recirc Valve is probably more effective at preventing compressor surge.

2. You probably are loosing HP inserting a massive vent into the intake.

3. You have voided any future service claims on your Mini-Cayenne.

Modifications are supposed to improve the performance, not void everything, result in a CEL and possible misfireing cylinders just so the ******* truck will sound like a tuner car..

The whole thing is s***. From Plan to Execution.
Wow, that is probably one of the most intelligent things I have read in a while. The CX-7 being a mini-cayenne? Just like the Mazda p5 is another "insert competitor" wagon. By the way, if you meant losing as in "you are losing this debate" try LOSING an "O". Also, as for a loss of performance by adding a blow-off valve, do you have a dyno graph to prove your point, as most people who make such a definitive statement back it up with fact. I don't believe CPE is staying in business by making in-effective parts that actually lose power. Whether or not a VTA blow-off valve will lose power or cause any problems with idle or CEL on the CX-7 is unknown but the blow-off valve is universal in the fact that it can be a VTA or a recirc. Also, I hardly think the stock Mazda blow-off will match the quality of the HKS, unless of course, they use a HKS.

Thanks though
and May God Bless you and yours
 
Whatever the case, I find people that feel they must insult others to feel justified in their actions are sad. They are pitiful. If brian is more man than ass he would allow others to pursue their desires without insulting them. Does it bother me? Nope, I could care in the least as I know that I didnt buy a sports car to tool my kids around in although Ill probably end up putting an intake, dp, exhaust etc on the car because I enjoy tinkering. I just think this would be a more inviting forums if people kept their negativity to themselves. Plus, I thought Canadians to be a peaceful bunch....is it because of Bush? :) Just kidding.
 
ok guys i think that this thread is going to a different road!!! Is just a damm nice awesome woshhhhhhhhh sound in a nice suv!!!!
 
FWIW I think the BOV is a silly thing to put on the CX-7 as well. I will be getting the CAI, but the BOV serves no purpose on this vehicle for me. However there was no mention by P5 dude on his opinion of the BOV, he slammed the CX-7 in general for no reason, really has no reason to even venture into this part of the forum. That is why I joined in the melee. No one here thinks the CX-7 is a racecar. However if CP-E makes some mods that will give me a little more power I will scoop them up. Still won't be "fast" by my terms, but it will make it a more enjoyable daily driver.

At anyrate neither the CX-7 or this dudes 13sec P5 are fast as far as I'm concerned. And I do know an asshole when I see one.
 
xavier said:
Also, as for a loss of performance by adding a blow-off valve, do you have a dyno graph to prove your point, as most people who make such a definitive statement back it up with fact. I don't believe CPE is staying in business by making in-effective parts that actually lose power. Whether or not a VTA blow-off valve will lose power or cause any problems with idle or CEL on the CX-7 is unknown but the blow-off valve is universal in the fact that it can be a VTA or a recirc. Also, I hardly think the stock Mazda blow-off will match the quality of the HKS, unless of course, they use a HKS.
The MSP was upgraded with a BOV many times because the car by design had massive compressor surge, Stock. The BPV simply did not work, you could actually hear it clearly, it was called turkey... Search, there are thousands of threads on it. The CX-7 with the DISI was not designed quickly, it shares a platform with several new offerings by Mazda, they went out of their way to kill the compressor surge, fix the bottom end and economy problems from their first attempt. The BPV is designed to keep the turbine spooled during shifts. Venting too much and you have just lost your spool. The BPV will give the engine a more constant flow in it's stock form so I do not need to see a dyno for it.

xavier said:
Thanks though
and May God Bless you and yours
Do me a favor and drink the Cool-Aid first...
 
Mazda3 said:
FWIW I think the BOV is a silly thing to put on the CX-7 as well. I will be getting the CAI, but the BOV serves no purpose on this vehicle for me. However there was no mention by P5 dude on his opinion of the BOV, he slammed the CX-7 in general for no reason, really has no reason to even venture into this part of the forum. That is why I joined in the melee. No one here thinks the CX-7 is a racecar. However if CP-E makes some mods that will give me a little more power I will scoop them up. Still won't be "fast" by my terms, but it will make it a more enjoyable daily driver.

At anyrate neither the CX-7 or this dudes 13sec P5 are fast as far as I'm concerned. And I do know an asshole when I see one.

I agree^^
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Threads and Articles

Back