Ugly skyline!

Yell03SpecV said:
So many ignorant people posting in this thread.


understatement of the freaking century. This isnt a standard GT-R, the is the ER-34, meaning the sedan version among other blatant differences. The sheer volume of hours put into that (engine transplant, detailing, wire tucks, we're talking 1000's of hours im willing to bet) makes me want to shake the man's hand. At the pont that his car is at, he could paint it with his own s*** and the car would still be one of the cleanest and well-thought out skylines in the world.
 
yesiownaskyline said:
understatement of the freaking century. This isnt a standard GT-R, the is the ER-34, meaning the sedan version among other blatant differences. The sheer volume of hours put into that (engine transplant, detailing, wire tucks, we're talking 1000's of hours im willing to bet) makes me want to shake the man's hand. At the pont that his car is at, he could paint it with his own s*** and the car would still be one of the cleanest and well-thought out skylines in the world.

(yippy) you deserve a round of applause for this post.
 
The only thing I didnt like was that color. I puke prettier colors than whatever green/brownish mixture they sprayed on that thing
 
naw man that car is awesome..i would rock that color too

that turbo is so frickin huge. you could lose your hand in it..
i saw a vid on youtube a loong time ago.. some guy was pointing at his huge turbo and then *suck* his fingers got sucked in..
 
yesiownaskyline said:
understatement of the freaking century. This isnt a standard GT-R, the is the ER-34, meaning the sedan version among other blatant differences. The sheer volume of hours put into that (engine transplant, detailing, wire tucks, we're talking 1000's of hours im willing to bet) makes me want to shake the man's hand. At the pont that his car is at, he could paint it with his own s*** and the car would still be one of the cleanest and well-thought out skylines in the world.

Man you take this way to serious. It's clear from the Link it's the 4Dr. Whats the big deal? I still prefer the standard 2 Dr GTR. And I still think that despite the time and effort put into the car (and I'm sure it's insanely fast and a very competent vehicle) the thing is UGLY.

What are these other BLATANT differneces that your're talking about?

Ugly is Ugly.

The Kit is Ugly

The Wheels are Ugly

The color is HORRID!

the only thing pretty about this car is it's Engine bay.

This thing would look right at home on the set of the fast and the ridiculous.

Of course this is all my opinion. So feel free to disagree with me!
 
That is a pretty bad ass Skyline. The color is iffy, too camo for me, but idk, I like it.
 
lasermp5 said:
How can you not like the HRE wheels????


Because they like to disentegrate under track conditions. I believe several racing organizations banned them. Function before form.
 
InFlames said:
lol @ arguing over looks.

Looks are subjective.

So you mean to tell me that "bad taste" doesn't exist?

And also I have yet to find the person that thinks that the pontiac aztek is a "good looking car". Let's face it. Some things are just not pretty.

:)

Anyways, it's fun to throw opinions back and forth.
But you're right overall. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 
xelderx said:
Because they like to disentegrate under track conditions. I believe several racing organizations banned them. Function before form.

WOW... news to me. That's a shame; for what they cost they should be trackable wheels.
 
Donas64 said:
I love a clean looking skyline like this

282997_129_full.jpg


no doubt the turtle wax skyline is fast as heck, I mean with a turbo the size of a small panet and all, but pretty it is not.

I am almost 100% positive that is not a stock 34 bumper, correct me if I am wrong though.
 
Last edited:
how would that skyline be considered ugly? yeah it has some lame turtle wax decals on it, but those can be removed.
 
Back