"Today, I weep for my country"

A friend of mine sent me this, thought provoking, speech:

> Arrogance of Power
>Today, I Weep for my Country...
> by US Senator Robert Byrd
> Speech delivered on the floor of the US Senate
> March 19, 2003 3:45pm
> I believe in this beautiful country. I have studied its roots and gloried
>in the wisdom of its magnificent Constitution. I have marveled at the
>wisdom of its founders and framers. Generation after generation of
>Americans has understood the lofty ideals that underlie our great Republic.
>I have been inspired by the story of their sacrifice and their strength.
> But, today I weep for my country. I have watched the events of recent
>months with a heavy, heavy heart. No more is the image of America one of
>strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. The image of America has changed.
>Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our
>intentions are questioned.
> Instead of reasoning with those with whom we disagree, we demand
>obedience or threaten recrimination. Instead of isolating Saddam Hussein,
>we seem to have isolated ourselves. We proclaim a new doctrine of
>preemption which is understood by few and feared by many. We say that the
>United States has the right to turn its firepower on any corner of the
>globe which might be suspect in the war on terrorism. We assert that right
>without the sanction of any international body. As a result, the world has
>become a much more dangerous place.
> We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance. We treat UN Security
>Council members like ingrates who offend our princely dignity by lifting
>their heads from the carpet. Valuable alliances are split.
> After war has ended, the United States will have to rebuild much more
>than the country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America's image around
>the globe.
> The case this Administration tries to make to justify its fixation with
>war is tainted by charges of falsified documents and circumstantial
>evidence. We cannot convince the world of the necessity of this war for one
>simple reason. This is a war of choice.
> There is no credible information to connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11. The
>twin towers fell because a world-wide terrorist group, Al Qaeda, with cells
>in over 60 nations, struck at our wealth and our influence by turning our
>own planes into missiles, one of which would likely have slammed into the
>dome of this beautiful Capitol except for the brave sacrifice of the
>passengers on board.
> The brutality seen on September 11th and in other terrorist attacks we
>have witnessed around the globe are the violent and desperate efforts by
>extremists to stop the daily encroachment of western values upon their
>cultures. That is what we fight. It is a force not confined to borders. It
>is a shadowy entity with many faces, many names, and many addresses.
> But, this Administration has directed all of the anger, fear, and grief
>which emerged from the ashes of the twin towers and the twisted metal of
>the Pentagon towards a tangible villain, one we can see and hate and
>attack. And villain he is. But, he is the wrong villain. And this is the
>wrong war. If we attack Saddam Hussein, we will probably drive him from
>power. But, the zeal of our friends to assist our global war on terrorism
>may have already taken flight.
> The general unease surrounding this war is not just due to "orange
>alert." There is a pervasive sense of rush and risk and too many questions
>unanswered. How long will we be in Iraq? What will be the cost? What is the
>ultimate mission? How great is the danger at home?
> A pall has fallen over the Senate Chamber. We avoid our solemn duty to
>debate the one topic on the minds of all Americans, even while scores of
>thousands of our sons and daughters faithfully do their duty in Iraq.
> What is happening to this country? When did we become a nation which
>ignores and berates our friends? When did we decide to risk undermining
>international order by adopting a radical and doctrinaire approach to using
>our awesome military might? How can we abandon diplomatic efforts when the
>turmoil in the world cries out for diplomacy?
> Why can this President not seem to see that America's true power lies not
>in its will to intimidate, but in its ability to inspire?
> War appears inevitable. But, I continue to hope that the cloud will lift.
>Perhaps Saddam will yet turn tail and run. Perhaps reason will somehow
>still prevail. I along with millions of Americans will pray for the safety
>of our troops, for the innocent civilians in Iraq, and for the security of
>our homeland. May God continue to bless the United States of America in the
>troubled days ahead, and may we somehow recapture the vision which for the
>present eludes us.
> ###
 
what an embarrasment he is to our country. at a time of war, can we not all unite under our leaders, pray for them, and support them?

Looks like he's trying to get himself "re-elected", just like all the other democrats.

(76% of americans say they support war, so this means that even democrats support war! Apparently Mr Byrd doesnt realize that)


"WHAT IS RIGHT MAY NOT ALWAYS BE WHAT IS POPULAR"
 
pdhaudio said:
what an embarrasment he is to our country. at a time of war, can we not all unite under our leaders, pray for them, and support them?

Looks like he's trying to get himself "re-elected", just like all the other democrats.

(76% of americans say they support war, so this means that even democrats support war! Apparently Mr Byrd doesnt realize that)


"WHAT IS RIGHT MAY NOT ALWAYS BE WHAT IS POPULAR"

:confused:
 
pdhaudio said:
can we not all unite under our leaders, pray for them, and support them?

I along with millions of Americans will pray for the safety of our troops, for the innocent civilians in Iraq, and for the security of our homeland.

Did you read the whole thing?
 
chuyler1 said:


I along with millions of Americans will pray for the safety of our troops, for the innocent civilians in Iraq, and for the security of our homeland.

Did you read the whole thing?

i did also say u-n-i-t-e
 
What else do you expect, he's a politician!

pretty ******' low, politics over the troops. And if you agree with what the "honarable" senator from West Virginia said, why didn't he give a similar speech when Clinton went ahead without U.N. approval when he attacked Serbia?
 
pdhaudio said:
what an embarrasment he is to our country. at a time of war, can we not all unite under our leaders, pray for them, and support them?

Looks like he's trying to get himself "re-elected", just like all the other democrats.

(76% of americans say they support war, so this means that even democrats support war! Apparently Mr Byrd doesnt realize that)


"WHAT IS RIGHT MAY NOT ALWAYS BE WHAT IS POPULAR"

I agree, he is an embarrasment, and congrats to him on not being reelected. Did anybody hear the mother of the guy that died flying the chopper today? She asked her son before he died "is this really worth it" and he said "there is a lot of stuff you don't know and that it is very worth it", thats coming from someone over there, that's gotta mean something. And even if you don't support the war people need to realize that you should support your country, we are at war so accept it. It's like if you have a son and he turns gay, you need to stick by him. That sounded stupid but i hope people reading this get the point lol.
 
Well, for one thing, I would guess that this was a speach made before we went to war, as it plainly states that he hopes we won't go to war. And as far what he has to say, he has the right to say that. That is what I love about this country. We have the right to disagree with those in power. We have the right to throw our lives away as some "HUMAN SHEILD" because of our beliefs. And we have the right to reelect or not reelect or run for some type of leadership office it we feel that the ones in power are not doing the right thing. Without those rights we wouldn't be debating weather or not this guy is a anti-american socialist asshole or not. (Which he probably isn't since one of the two most patriotic things that I feel a person can do is be part of the government. The other is be part of the military). And we have the right to support our troops in the way that we see fit.

I respect the Senator for being willing to speak his mind and try to change what he feels is wrong. Would it vote for him again, I don't know.

And I really dout that he doesn't support our troops.

The only thing in his speach that I realy don't understand is the comment about the extreamist fighting the intrusion of western values on their culture. Do we go to Iraq or Afganistan to go to school. Do we see Al Qaeda missionaries coming to the US to help with the staving sick children. No, and even though I don't agree with everything we do, I do agree with the fact that we have one of the best countries in the world.
 
chuyler1 said:
Being gay is not a choice...
...bad analogy, very bad analogy.

Being gay is not a choice? that is an opinion, its not a fact (even though i do believe that being gay is not a choice, i think you are born that way), but im sure by that analogy you can get the point. The point is that you need to stick by each other. For example thats ur son and you need to be by his side. The US is OUR country and we should stick by what choices the president makes. Even though it was a choice we should still stick by it once it already happened. I didn't want to go to war at all, I have 3 good friends that are in Iraq right now. Even though i didn't want to go to war i realize i have no choice and i will stick by what my country's leaders do, wether i like them or not.
 
sigh, don't you looove polls especially when it's so misleading. people could be supporting the war simply based on the fact that they believe they're supporting the troops, when they're two quite different things. THEREFORE that poll is a misleading pos statistic.
 
I doubt supporting vietnam would have changed the outcome.

I could care less either way right now. but what really pisses me off is the body counts on the 6:00 news and the "we have information that one of our platoons was hit by a grenade, more news at 11" bulls***.

When we have a chapter about this war in a social studies book let me know and I'll read up. I'm not interested in hearing about it right now.
 

New Threads and Articles

Back