...the more things stay the same, as the saying goes.
I like to call my Mazda5 a microvan, but a comparison with the original 1984 Chrysler Corp. minivans show that it is very close to the same size:
1984 Plymouth Voyager/Dodge Caravan, 2006 Mazda5
Length, 176.0 in., 181.5 in.
Height, 64.2 in., 64.2 in.
Width, 68.9 in., 69.1 in.
Wheelbase, 112.0 in., 108.3 in.
Curb weight, <3,300 lbs., 3,333/3,389 lbs.
Seats, 7 passengers, 6 passengers
Cargo cap. seats up, 11 cu. ft., 12 cu. ft.
Cargo cap., 3rd row removed/down, NA, 44.4 cu. ft.
Cargo cap., 2nd and 3rd rows removed/down, 125 cu. ft., 90.0 cu. ft.
HP, 101/104, 157
0-60 mph, 14.7 secs. (104 HP eng.), 10.1 secs.
Base price, $10,060, $17,435
Sticker corrected for inflation, $18,621, $17,435
Some conclusions:
* "Regular" minivans have grown a lot since 1984.
* The dimensions that gave the name "magic van" to the 1984 Chryslers still work very well.
* I think the Mazda5 is better in every way than the 1984 Chryslers (check the HP and 0-60 figures, not to mention the safety equipment), and a steal at close to the same price.
Is the Mazda5 bound to grow over the years the same way the "original" minivans did?
.
I like to call my Mazda5 a microvan, but a comparison with the original 1984 Chrysler Corp. minivans show that it is very close to the same size:
1984 Plymouth Voyager/Dodge Caravan, 2006 Mazda5
Length, 176.0 in., 181.5 in.
Height, 64.2 in., 64.2 in.
Width, 68.9 in., 69.1 in.
Wheelbase, 112.0 in., 108.3 in.
Curb weight, <3,300 lbs., 3,333/3,389 lbs.
Seats, 7 passengers, 6 passengers
Cargo cap. seats up, 11 cu. ft., 12 cu. ft.
Cargo cap., 3rd row removed/down, NA, 44.4 cu. ft.
Cargo cap., 2nd and 3rd rows removed/down, 125 cu. ft., 90.0 cu. ft.
HP, 101/104, 157
0-60 mph, 14.7 secs. (104 HP eng.), 10.1 secs.
Base price, $10,060, $17,435
Sticker corrected for inflation, $18,621, $17,435
Some conclusions:
* "Regular" minivans have grown a lot since 1984.
* The dimensions that gave the name "magic van" to the 1984 Chryslers still work very well.
* I think the Mazda5 is better in every way than the 1984 Chryslers (check the HP and 0-60 figures, not to mention the safety equipment), and a steal at close to the same price.
Is the Mazda5 bound to grow over the years the same way the "original" minivans did?
.