they made a 2.0L Mazda6? (uhm)Da 6 said:one of our 2.0l 6 members has sucessfully installed the 2.3 header and cut to fit his aem. the header I can say is feasable but the intake I'd say 3s injen was last known to not touch the return bolt of atx trannys. As for other stuff...Someone needs to take the inititive(if they already didn't) and grab a fsm like our 6tech guys. They show parts layouts and that way you can say catback "A" will fit both cars cause from bolt X to bolt Y they are both same part #s.
2.3l is smallest in N. American market. But in some markets there are even 1.8l Mazda6's.nate0123 said:they made a 2.0L Mazda6? (uhm)
mp3moose said:^hmm, I doubt they are the same. The location is similar, but the manifold has to be different.
normaly we (AzMz3) NEVER agree but this time I do...why would the engine placement and header be 100% difrent? I know the mounts are due to the fact the 2.0 is being placed into a 3.0 engine bay but other than that and pcm. We have a member with 2.0 and no exhaust leaks sucessfully bolt up a draxas uncoated header with only the stock heatshield removal being a problem. If you get a header get coated so you won't need to heat wrap it.AzMz3 said:Why does the manifold "have" to be different?