LinuxRacr said:Be warry of TKT Systems!
mp3boy1984 said:I think our cars have a lot of potential being naturally aspirated. No one wants to do the god damn work or research. And i pitty you all that think turbo's are all we have that will make our cars fast. Even though i am getting a turbo, if i didn't like the cool noise they make, and oh yes the ultimate goal, supreme horsepower, i bet that you could easily achieve 200 hp at the wheels with our cars without a turbo. All it takes is some money and a dream.
Peace,
Evan
Rogue_Biker said:
And yeah. High compression along with a Turbocharger is a disastrous combo. You want to keep your compression down around 8 to 1 or 8.5 to 1 if you plan on boosting above 10 psi. Although those Turbo kits work with the stock 9.5 to 1 compression because they don't boost beyond 8 psi I think.
mp3boy1984 said:why would i have to worry about Knight turbo's he doesn't even make the turbo's he uses mitsu, and T3-T4's and then he makes them fit our engines, so i don't even see how that could be thomas knight's fault. I am going to get one, and i will let you know how everything goes. And if it is a piece, then i guess you can all laugh at me, but if it works i will laugh at you all.
1st MP3 in NH said:The relaity:
Fast = 0-60 5 seconds
Quick 0-60 6 seconds
average 0-60 7 seconds
SLOW 0-60 8 seconds or higher.
Even with intake, exhuast, and header no Protege is breking 7 with cams maybe close. Without turbo or high compresion no way.
These are my terms to describe a respectable performance car, not all cars.Kooldino said:
WTF world do you live in? I'd like to live there...since your "average" car runs 0-60 in 7 seconds. Your average car in the US runs around 11's 0-60.