SNSFW - Wtf???

Is it just me, or do people complain to much about stupid s*** like NSFW. How about you do your freakin job then you wouldnt have time to go online. I know a lot of people are like....boohooo my job is so boring, im on my lunch, boohoo all i can do is read this forum all day boohoo. Get a life.
 
DSM2MSP said:
Is it just me, or do people complain to much about stupid s*** like NSFW. How about you do your freakin job then you wouldnt have time to go online. I know a lot of people are like....boohooo my job is so boring, im on my lunch, boohoo all i can do is read this forum all day boohoo. Get a life.

(direct) i was about to say the same thing.
 
BAH! nsfw is cack! if someone is offended by that, they need to get out a little more.......
the pic>>> clearly this chick's pants have holes all over them, SO IMO she is being penetrated through 1 of her many holes...... in her pants of course
 
Just because a picture does not show nudity, does not make it safe for work.

It all comes down to respect, or in this case the lack of respect. Whether I surf at work or home is not the question. It doesn't matter if I surf from a church, a business office, at an automotive shop, or at home. The picture in question is suggestive of sexual activities, which makes it possibly offensive to others. You need to respect the fact that people can get offended by such things. And if a female co-worker was walking past my office while I had that picture up on my monitor, it could offend her, getting me in trouble.

The thread title is completly devoide of information about what the thread contains. No, it does not say "Click here". However as a curtiousy to other forum members all thread titles should reflect the nature of the thread. As humans we are curious and when a thread appears with "WTF?" we are curious as to what made you say that. But if this thread said "WTF? bored girl's dorm room pictures. Possible NSFW" or something of that nature, it would be obvious that 1)- the thread had pictures which would slow down the surfing of dial-up members, and 2)- let people know there may be pictures attached which are possibly not safe for work.

It all comes down to respect of others.

My intention is not to start a flame war, and I've said what I needed to say. Feel free to reply back with your jouvinile comments if you want.
 
MiaTurbo said:
Just because a picture does not show nudity, does not make it safe for work.

It all comes down to respect, or in this case the lack of respect. Whether I surf at work or home is not the question. It doesn't matter if I surf from a church, a business office, at an automotive shop, or at home. The picture in question is suggestive of sexual activities, which makes it possibly offensive to others. You need to respect the fact that people can get offended by such things. And if a female co-worker was walking past my office while I had that picture up on my monitor, it could offend her, getting me in trouble.

The thread title is completly devoide of information about what the thread contains. No, it does not say "Click here". However as a curtiousy to other forum members all thread titles should reflect the nature of the thread. As humans we are curious and when a thread appears with "WTF?" we are curious as to what made you say that. But if this thread said "WTF? bored girl's dorm room pictures. Possible NSFW" or something of that nature, it would be obvious that 1)- the thread had pictures which would slow down the surfing of dial-up members, and 2)- let people know there may be pictures attached which are possibly not safe for work.

It all comes down to respect of others.

My intention is not to start a flame war, and I've said what I needed to say. Feel free to reply back with your jouvinile comments if you want.
YOU STILL WOULD HAVE CLICKED IT AND OPENED THE THREAD...ADMIT IT!
 
GI- said:
YOU STILL WOULD HAVE CLICKED IT AND OPENED THE THREAD...ADMIT IT!
Probably, but certainly not at work.
 
MiaTurbo said:
Feel free to reply back with your jouvinile comments if you want.
Why is it that when you respond it is with alot of insight and properly composed, but when I respond to your comments it is "juvenile"? If you are gonna act that way, I give you a big ole'

**** YOU b****!!!!
 
GI- said:
Why is it that when you respond it is with alot of insight and properly composed, but when I respond to your comments it is "juvenile"? If you are gonna act that way, I give you a big ole'

**** YOU b****!!!!
Thank you for proving my point
 
GI- said:
So who changed my thread title??????????????????????????
So nobody wants to "man up" and admit to changing my thread title? God damn liberal's. Someone gets some sand in their vagina cuz they clicked on it at work, and you change the title?
 
so i have a question? If i took a picture of myself grabbing my junk fully clothed then it would be NSFW?
 
txrxs said:
so i have a question? If i took a picture of myself grabbing my junk fully clothed then it would be NSFW?
Yes. But if I did the same thing it wouldn't be.
 
Back