- :
- 2021 CX-9 Sig
- :
- 2021 CX-5 GT
My god people stop quoting this anti Mazda troll.
Bingo. Bingo! We have Bingo!
My god people stop quoting this anti Mazda troll.
It all depends on personal expectations and experiences. Imagine how a 1860's cowboy would have felt doing 0-60 in under 8 seconds? DOING 60 MPH AT ALL!!!?!? It takes 500+hp in a 3200# car to get my attention. Others may find 300hp in the same, "fast". This forum is total evidence of that. Noone here on stock suspension is pulling even 0.9g, and yet all they do is RRAAAVVEEEE about how this thing just DOMINATES corners, lol!
Let's complete this statement correctly so it doesn't sound so disingenuous like it does how you have it written now...
"And yet all they do is RRAAAVVEEEE about how this thing just DOMINATES corners, compared to other crossovers in the same segment
Some of you only view things in the extreme. "I can't possibly have fun driving a CX-5, because it's not a sports car and sports cars are fun". Sure, but why can't I have fun driving other cars too? I don't conform to your rules and you don't ******* speak for everybody.
Some of you are also one dimensional. "In order for cars to be fun, they have tons of HP". While I agree Mazda needs some faster engines in their lineup (would love to see some more Mazdaspeed), I've never been starved for power in my CX-5. It begs me to drive spirited. Unless there's some douchbag in a fast car stopped next to me at a light thinking he's racing everybody he stops next to, I smoke pretty much everything everytime.
Anyway I'll agree about the 2017. I'm really not fond of it at all, and can at least be consistent in why I like my CX-5.
So yeah, I guess it defies conventional logic a bit, but I love driving my CX-5 everytime I jump into it.
Let's make it even less disingenuous....how it SEEMS to compared to others, because it doesn't, by the numbers.
That in red did make me LOL though.
And I've never driven a 6 but why would I get one?
when I could get a new Camry with 300+HP, quad exhaust, and 8 speed automatic transmission with paddle shifters for the same price? The new Camry IMO looks like it's going to be a beast and the best bang for your buck in the class.
I just reread that and see what you mean. Let me clarify that I'm just driving normally, not even trying to smoke people. The CX-5 is spirited off the line.
I don't think that's what he meant. During daily driving, revving to 3-4000RPM the car is more impressive then the numbers suggest. It's actually peppy, responsive and fun. The gearing makes good use of the torque.
I just reread what I wrote and see what you mean. Let me fix that contradictory sentence by clarifying that I'm just driving normally, not even trying to smoke people. The CX-5 is just spirited off the line.
Edit: As for your first sentence, I guess something is working right to make it seem that way then. Because I drove the competition back then and it didn't even feel close.
I don't think that's what he meant. During daily driving, revving to 3-4000RPM the car is more impressive then the numbers suggest. It's actually peppy, responsive and fun. The gearing makes good use of the torque.
2017 > 2014
Let's make it even less disingenuous....how it SEEMS to compared to others, because it doesn't, by the numbers.
That's because the torque delivery is a total anomaly in an NA 4-banger, and like you say, the gearing is well done, especially with the AWD model. For the complete antithesis of this, check out the S2000.
It all depends on personal expectations and experiences. Imagine how a 1860's cowboy would have felt doing 0-60 in under 8 seconds? DOING 60 MPH AT ALL!!!?!? It takes 500+hp in a 3200# car to get my attention. Others may find 300hp in the same, "fast". This forum is total evidence of that. Noone here on stock suspension is pulling even 0.9g, and yet all they do is RRAAAVVEEEE about how this thing just DOMINATES corners, lol!
Agree 100%. What is most hilarious to me on this forum is how people discuss the performance of the CX-5, gems like:
"I smoke pretty much everything everytime not even trying"
Or
"I pop it into sport mode and leave it in the dust"
And why does 'performance off the line' even matter in a vehicle like this? I guess some like to close their eyes and think they're in a Ferrari every now and then.
By "rips", do you mean "sucks"? Because yeah, it does. For a 4 cylinder non-FI AWD SUV though, I think it's actually impressive. Just not "in the grand scheme of things". I view it as "adequate for the task at hand".
Ultimately though, people don't really care about actual performance data/numbers. They care about "feel", and the CX5 certainly "feels" good for what it is, I agree.
For the smaller Mazda 6, the 2.5L is fun.
From a dead stop the CX-5 is fine, at least to me. It's getting on the freeway with a semi on the left and I gotta get past it where I wish the vehicle had a bit more bite. It would also be nice if it had a bigger gas tank so I could go more than 320 miles without the orange light coming on.
And that's why it's selling so well right? Oh wait....
That engine is fine for the Mazda3, but under powered for the 6 and CX-5.
No Mango, I don't see myself driving a Ferrari when I drive my CX-5.
What I see is that it drives exactly how I like to drive and responds perfectly with how I like it to drive. And thus it is a fun and enjoyable experience.
Not sure why this is such a foreign concept? Oh that's right, it just give you an excuse to "spew s***" all over this forum to use someone else's phrase. Your previous post was nothing but a troll post that contributed nothing to the thread except apparently calling us all delusional because we can actually enjoy driving our CX-5. You really are a piece of work and one of these days people will stop quoting you so I can stop seeing your bulls***.
Yeah I agree with this statement. Best bet throwing it into sport mode and having the rpms in the best range possible. It surprisingly makes a difference.