Quickest cars of 2007

BlackCherry06

Member
:
'17 CX-3 GT
The Quickest Cars of 2007: $25,000 to $30,000

#5
Mazdaspeed 6
Base price: $28,590
0-to-60-mph time: 5.4 sec
Quarter-mile time: 14.0 sec @ 99 mph

We were sold the moment Mazda told us the company intended to stuff more power and all-wheel drive into the frisky 6 sedan. Mazda is better than most at making full dynamic use of every pony, and the Mazdaspeed 6 is no exception. Plenty of power is on tap-the 2.3-liter, turbocharged and direct-injected four-cylinder engine offers 270 horsepower and is a reminder how far Mazda's piston engines have progressed in the last decade, from cast-iron-block dinosaurs to top-shelf powerplants.

There are all-wheel-drive systems designed to prevent getting stuck in a snowdrift or pile of cow pucky, and there are those that work to help you go faster. We appreciate the former, dig the latter. The Mazdaspeed 6's all-wheel drive features an electromechanical wet-clutch pack, and when combinations of wheel slip, steering angle, lateral g, and the like are met, a computer can send up to half of the available 280 lb-ft of torque to the rear tires. The system doesn't create anything like lurid and lovely oversteer, but it is an effective antidote for killjoy understeer.

The Mazdaspeed 6's greatest enemy is its nearly 3600-pound curb weight, which it admittedly packs tight to its chest. Short gears, a short final drive, and a six-speed box means your left foot works to extract maximum grunt, but given the rush of acceleration, it's never a chore.

The Mazdaspeed 6 costs nearly as much as an Evo or an STI but is not as extreme; it costs less than a pimped-out A4 Quattro but doesn't offer Audi's cachet. Instead, it sits somewhere in the middle, offering Mazda-authentic gusto, commendable comfort, and slick styling.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

BASE PRICE: $28,590

ENGINE TYPE: turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 138 cu in, 2260cc
Power (SAE net): 270 bhp @ 5500 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 280 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed manual

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 105.3 in
Length: 186.8 in
Width: 70.1 in
Height: 56.3 in
Curb weight: 3589 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 5.4 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 14.5 sec
Zero to 110 mph: 17.5 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 6.9 sec
Standing -mile: 14.0 sec @ 99 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 149 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g

Beaten by: Legacy GT (1/10 of a second), Solstice / Sky Redline Auto, Mustang GT, EVO RS,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We actually are faster than a Mustang GT..

I beat one
(cabpatch)
GT's are teh slowness.

A person at my work has one with a huge 80mm throttle body + K&N filter + full borla exhaust + piggyback tuner.
My car beat his at 3.8psi.
 
GT's are teh slowness.

A person at my work has one with a huge 80mm throttle body + K&N filter + full borla exhaust + piggyback tuner.
My car beat his at 3.8psi.

When i had my 98 prelude with just a cai... i took a 2003 gt the second my vtec engaged in 2nd gear. they are lame
 
When i had my 98 prelude with just a cai... i took a 2003 gt the second my vtec engaged in 2nd gear. they are lame

must have been a v6 mustang. A near stock prelude would never pull on a GT period.

I hopr you don't think that a cai adds 30whp.....
 
Well, tomorrow I'm going on a trip to the Dragon's Tail with my friend.
We will see the results of

Mustang GT vs Protege LX-T(7 psi)
0-60mph
0-100mph
35-100mph

He just got a set of 4.10's for the rear so he's definitely pulling on me from a dead stop now.
 
ya i agree a GT is slower, but i would think a Solstice or sky would be alot slower no? correct me if im wrong but arn't they compared to the miata?

#5 not bad at all, what were the first 4 ahead?
 
ya i agree a GT is slower, but i would think a Solstice or sky would be alot slower no? correct me if im wrong but arn't they compared to the miata?

#5 not bad at all, what were the first 4 ahead?

Not the redline... it is pushing 260HP with a 2.0L engine turbo...

read the bottom of the first post, there are the other 4 that beat the speed6

And actually if this came from Car and Driver, the speed6 got 6th place, beaten by:
1st place Lancer Evo RS,
2nd place Mustang GT,
3rd place 350Z
4th place Solstice/Sky Redline,
5th place Legacy 2.5GT

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/12244/2007-mazdaspeed-6.html
 
Last edited:
Maybe I should stop picking on 350z's, the 2007's are finally faster. That sucks. (eekfu)

I'm still a little surprised the Mustang GT is that much faster though. I had no problems pulling on one from a street start (2nd gear) and the couple of times on the expressway.
 
I guess you haven't been out much...

i have plenty of friends and know plenty of people with GT mustangs. that dude wasnt driving hard at all...


so you have what size turbo?
was this from a roll?
it was a new mustang?
so you were partial throttling it to achieve a perfect 3.8 psi?


only thing i can think of was the tune was ****** up.
 
i have plenty of friends and know plenty of people with GT mustangs. that dude wasnt driving hard at all...


so you have what size turbo?
was this from a roll?
it was a new mustang?
so you were partial throttling it to achieve a perfect 3.8 psi?


only thing i can think of was the tune was ****** up.
GT28R
5mph roll to 70mph
2002 autotragic
Full throttle. Tial wastegate with 3.8939399347974psi spring and no MBC

The tune may be a f'up as it was made for his GT without the new intake.
 
I had about car length ahead of him.

___
I forgot to post results from the trip...

Mustang GT vs Protege LX-T(8.5 psi)
0-60mph : GT by 1/2 car
0-100mph : LX-T by 1 car
35-100mph : LX-T by 2 cars
 

New Threads and Articles

Back