Post The Best Pictures of Your Mazda

Lowering a car directly effects practicality by inhibiting your ability to use certain roads.

No, Slamming your car to the point of retardation effects practicality....
This may sound crazy, but you can have Coilovers without spinning them all the way down OMGWTFBBQSAUCE
 
IMG_20120929_165542.jpg
 
See, I disagree. I like knowing that the gorgeous car I'm seeing actually gets driven. Makes it more real and less like a comic book action hero.

I fail to see how having a front plate represents that the car gets driven, I'm simply stating that front plates are ugly and take away from a cars aesthetics... If I choose not to run a front plate it doesn't mean I don't still drive my car...
 
This. His MS3 doesn't need to be practical, nor should it be, it's just uncommon to see someone who has two modified (and friggin awesome, I might add) cars, as opposed to a tuner and a DD.

What about 3 modded cars? Haha.
 
RE Front plates: It's a Mazda forum. These aren't ubercars. We aren't posting pictures of trailer queens. Well, ok, a handful of us have dedicated race cars that aren't insured, so I guess that counts? But those definitely get driven.

RE Lowering: Unless you're planning on going off roading, the only thing lowering hurts you on (unless it's slammed to crap, ugh, can't believe I'm agreeing with Tungsten) is the occasional super-tall speed bump. Heck, my P5 was lowered on Tein S-Techs. Not super-duper low, but low enough. I had a girlfriend that lived on a rutted dirt road at the time. Never had an issue. Pretty practical.
 
8003839690_293287c648_h.jpg


More pictures please. :)

(No front license plate for me ;) )
 
No, Slamming your car to the point of retardation effects practicality....

Maybe I'm just biased, cause delivering pizza on stock height I've run in to plenty of situations where I almost didn't make it through. I'm sure other towns aren't nearly as bad. To get to the high school in my town, you literally have to drive down a dirt road. No way around it at the moment. I really don't have a problem with lowered cars, they look sweet and handle sweeter. What does piss me off is when people cut their stock springs to lower their car, the only reason your car should be lower is if it is on aftermarket, improved suspension... that's off topic but whatever. But you can't honestly tell me that a lowered car is just as practical as a car at stock height. The lowered car may not be impractical, but the stock height car will be more versatile.

Just make a simple observation and get torn apart... dear god

Also I never said his MS3 was impractical, I just said that it's uncommon to see someone with two modded cars. I said that his MS3 was more practical than his mx-5, which is hardly arguable.

I find it comical that the more practical of your two cars is a modded, lowered MS3. Sweet rides (2thumbs)

/pointless argument
 
I think he was just saying how most people have an unmodded, econobox and a very heavily modded car. In this case, he has a very low, non-practical for a DD car and a fairly modded "normal" car. I don't think he was bashing it's practicality but more or less showing the perspective on practicality between his two rides.

I could be wrong though.

Just make a simple observation and get torn apart... dear god

Also I never said his MS3 was impractical, I just said that it's uncommon to see someone with two modded cars. I said that his MS3 was more practical than his mx-5, which is hardly arguable.

I get it.
 
Back