Guess it's time for me to post this once again:
While I appreciate the time/effort that went into creating this... it's patently ridiculous! Simply change the gender of the people pictured above and your argument holds no water. Let's see... do I want to drive a car that looks like a wimpy, albeit good-looking guy or some jacked-up dude with roid-rage?
All I know is, the new SRT may not have the clean lines of an exotic sports car. But so what? Not every car has to be drop-dead gorgeous. In fact, some (myself included) actually prefer cars (like the Element, last gen WRX and even Hummer) which certainly would never win a beauty contest... but are at least different and "cool" in their own unique way.
Most of us are obviously fans of imports. Why else would we own a Mazda (or belong to a Mazda board) At the same time, I seriously doubt any of us would kick a Corvette, Viper or Mustang GT out of bed. While this new SRT obviously isn't in the same league as those cars, I feel we should still appreciate it for what it is... just like we do with those cars. Until recently, the Vettes interior was pure crap. Did anyone give a s***? Not really... the car still drove about as well as the exotics (costing twice as much) it competed with. To a certain degree, this car is no different. So why isn't it getting ANY respect?
A point that needs to be hammered home is the fact that, despite the perception, this car proportionately very similar to the beloved MS3.
SRT (L x W x H) 173.8 68.8 60.4 3189lbs
MS3 (L x W x H) [SIZE=-1]176.8 x 69.5 x 57.7 3163lbs
So the MS3 is 3" longer... nearly an inch wider and 2.7" shorter. 2.7 inches... That's like the length of your thumb! Oh and... it's 26lbs heavier. Big deal!
As some of you may recall, Dodge under-promised/over-delivered on the original SRT. Not only were the hp #s understated but the car delivered performance #s far better than what people had originally expected. Will history repeat itself? Probably not... in comparison to the last gen model, this car IS pretty damn big/heavy. But then again... in comparison to the MSP, the MS3 is pretty damn big/heavy as well! With most publications testing the MS3 at about 5.8 seconds... a "low 6 second" (I don't know... call it 6.2 before the #s come out) isn't terrible. Everyone gets so hung up on #s... especially 0-60 times. Unless you're doing burnouts, those times mean s***. And even if you are... are you really going to notice a difference between .4 seconds? It's all psychological.
Just like defending the nerd from the school bully at recess, this is no different. I didn't particularly care for the nerd back then and I don't particularly care for this iteration now. But fair is fair... and nobody (or nothing) should be picked on unjustly.
[/SIZE]