(iagree)^ Dude that is just a bunch of bulls*** all wrapped in a neat package with a "Mazda Tech Answer" bow on it.
What you have here is completely wrong.
MAZDASPEED intakes are made by AEM, and while they are nice, it has been proven time and again that they actually cause problems all by themselves, typically due to their incorrect MAF metering section. This slight mis-calibration throws off some cars more then others, but ask around and you will see what's up. Truth is, whether it is an engineered SRI like Cobb's, or an engineered CAI like CP-E, you'll find the main factors in those being so successful and seamless in our cars to be the same thing: the MAF section is identical to stock in size.
Mazda didn't tune for anything with this intake, or any other. This computer learns the A/F, MAF inputs, and driving habits amongst other things and eventually creates its own trims depending on those variables.
Lastly, probably the reason why CAI's are working here while SRI's aren't is NOT that too much air is entering the intake! This is just silly. It is likely an issue of the short ram not being designed properly to straighten the airflow in time (unlike a long tube will tend to do), and this non-linear airflow is disrupting the MAF! The Cobb SRI doesn't have this problem, because they engineered a velocity stack to straighten the flow out. Simple.
This is your first post, but seriously, I'd reconsider telling anybody you are a Mazda tech until you've got the facts straight, not just what someone told you.
This is not to flame you or insult you, but to correct the mis-information that is coming out of your post.
Do any of the major chains (or websites) carry airflow straighteners for do-it-yourself types?
well, it just so happened that when i first turbocharged my 240sx, i used a hacked mafs setup. it used the principle that going from stock 270cc injectors to a set of sr20det 370cc injectors that dropped in the fuel rail, was an increase of ~37%. luckily, late model 240sx's used plastic mafs housings with a probe style, hotwire MAFs. DSMs had done this before as well, so what we did was cut the MAFs housing to just the probe and square area above it that housed the circuit board/electronics.
Doing some calculations with radius, diameter, pi, and using our 37% increase from stepping up to the larger injectors, we were able to find out the size that the "new" MAFs needed to be. the stock MAFs was ~2.4xx" inner diameter, and after the calculations, we came up with a figure that a 37% larger MAFs housing would have to be ~2.875". perfect. we then placed our MAFs probe in a 3" outer diameter pipe, with 1/8" walls (.125"), making the inner diameter 2 7/8" (2.875").
this was all done to bypass having to buy an s-afc,and cut the fuel trims by 37%. plus, being an s-afc tricks the MAFs signal going to the ECU, the timing maps remained unchanged and can cause problems when starting to really fool with s-afc "tunes". (the hacked mafs setup we used, we just used a .75 degree of timing retard per lb of boost, and we deviated from the stock 20 degrees by moving base to 16* BTDC and were only planning to run 7-10psi, and it worked out perfectly, for being way cheaper and definitely safe.
im hoping to get it as my license plate soon. most people don't understand it.
and then still don't understand it when i say "pound per square inch"....
Can you post pics of the fabricated straighteners?
I think advance auto parts or pep boys, or you can check spectre website:
http://spectreperformance.com/