86_911_4sale
Member
Here are a few comments from a post I put up on www.sccaforums.com (the stock class section):
the lack of camber available on the Protege will be its downfall. It will get EATEN ALIVE by the ITR in any sort of sweeper. That's my 2 cents at least.
And
I ran the MP3 in GS at nationals. The lack of camber in the Proteges is numbing. I did well locally, but at big events I was just easy cannon fodder. Even with the Kuhmos there wasn't enough grip in the corners, and they get shredded if you barely exceed the slip angles.
I love the car, but hope, for the MSP owners sake, they add some camber adjustment. Otherwise, you'll have a 170hp, LSD tire-shredder.
The suspension kicks butt though!
I hope they are wrong about the MS-P eating tires since 17 R- compound tires are pretty pricey! I know my 99 Civic Si wasnt too friendly on front tires either so I can see being competitive by keeping fresh rubber on the car could be expensive.
Does anyone know if they might have added camber adjustement to the MS-P? Any other thoughts?
-T
the lack of camber available on the Protege will be its downfall. It will get EATEN ALIVE by the ITR in any sort of sweeper. That's my 2 cents at least.
And
I ran the MP3 in GS at nationals. The lack of camber in the Proteges is numbing. I did well locally, but at big events I was just easy cannon fodder. Even with the Kuhmos there wasn't enough grip in the corners, and they get shredded if you barely exceed the slip angles.
I love the car, but hope, for the MSP owners sake, they add some camber adjustment. Otherwise, you'll have a 170hp, LSD tire-shredder.
The suspension kicks butt though!
I hope they are wrong about the MS-P eating tires since 17 R- compound tires are pretty pricey! I know my 99 Civic Si wasnt too friendly on front tires either so I can see being competitive by keeping fresh rubber on the car could be expensive.
Does anyone know if they might have added camber adjustement to the MS-P? Any other thoughts?
-T
