Da 6 said:The leather seats in the 6 and F/L/M vehicles are actualy comfortable compared to the CTS ones. CTS ones reminded me of my cloth seats in my 6, but with leather.
Above statement is true and I did drive the V6 CTS on multiple occasions.
that was their reasoning for not doing a Scoop.Hughes412 said:Well first off, you should read Mazdas reason for making the MS6. The MS6 is't for the young tunners, it is geared more the the OLDER family guys like me that want some thing sporty (lke the STI EVO) but not as hard core fast and furious looking as the STI EVO. I personally don't want a car with a wing the size of a small child. With the MS6 you can still take a woman on a date and look like an adult but then the next day you can put on your play close and tear up the streets. The only thing I see wrong with it is that one, it should be 300+hp and maybe start around 24-25k. Other than that is on par for what it is.
You tring to get me to fall out of love with my mercuryspeed grand marquis?seanmcsean said:no cts-v though.. dang.
Da 6 said:that was their reasoning for not doing a Scoop.
You tring to get me to fall out of love with my mercuryspeed grand marquis?
forrestt said:I bought my MS6 because it was understated (great for the highway), fast (enough for my needs), unique, technologically advanced, and roomy enough for my 12 and 14 year olds.
I, too, believe it's not marketed for 20 year olds. I'm 48, and my previous 4 cars in the past 8 years:
MINI Cooper S (fun, but too small)
Ford Contour SVT (same logic as MS6)
PT Cruiser (well, it looked neat - for 2 weeks)
Mustang GT (Vortech Supercharger, in arrest me red)
It's not the perfect car (M3 with SMG I think fits that bill, but $60K?!!), but for today, it's close. Closer than the WRX, STI, TSX for me.
I'm amazed at the number of folks panning the MS6 who don't own one, or haven't even driven one. I find it easier to compare vehicles I've driven than to read magazine articles or what others have written about cars, before making up my mind.
Go drive the MS6 with an open mind, not preconceived notions, then come back and tell us what you think.
forrestt said:I bought my MS6 because it was understated (great for the highway), fast (enough for my needs), unique, technologically advanced, and roomy enough for my 12 and 14 year olds.
I, too, believe it's not marketed for 20 year olds.
I was going to post that too, but im sure id get the age old response of "well this is only in a few vehicles, all cars have problems....blah blah blah"03MzdSpdSTP said:the speed 6 is plauged with random powerloss on the topend. 93octane or not its Hesitation part 2.
slug420 said:i wont even test drive one out of principle, so unattractive
Replica said:It's the automotive equivilent of "She's ugly but has a great personality"
bazooka joe said:i disagree, i don;t think it's unatractive at all, you lower that thing get some nice rims and tires....saw one today go by me at a light had a bosal exhaust, i think, it looked nice...i'd consider the ms6, but it is on the heavy side...waits for the ms3...
270hp in a huge car. I read they are low 14's but for some reason for $30,000 it kinda bums me out. i think im just jaded.seanmcsean said:not a bad idea.. I'm not a huge fan of the wheels on the car, but for 270+ hp, I'd live
03MzdSpdSTP said:the speed 6 is plauged with random powerloss on the topend. 93octane or not its Hesitation part 2.