The MSP is a looker... no doubt! But I think the MS3 might grow on you.... It certainly has better tail lights! With the LEDs on the GT, they could potentially be some of the better tails I've seen. (I'm sort've weird in the way that's important to me) Much like women, I find the rear of a car to be important. From this view, the MS3 looks pretty damn sweet. Big exhaust, black defuser, aforementioned tails, large Mazda logo.... it just looks slick. The front isn't nearly as good... I seriously dislike the grille and that black strip is ridiculous. floating foglights??? haha what a joke! by comparrison, the MSP's front never ceases to amaze me.. side profile... no contest! hatch vs sedan. nuff said!!
Even with all that said, this car destroys the msp in what should be the most important category... combine that with an awesome interior and an added level of versatility i think most would find a value in... and you've got yourself a nice solid, yet far from perfect, car.
I used to think the same was as you with regard to the absense of AWD.... then I learned that Mazda's awd system basically blows. It's OK for a vehicle like the CX-9 and even the MS6 (assuming the person who bought it isn't interested in performance as much as they safety) but for those who value performance as much (like those in which Mazda is marketing the MS3) its' added cost alone makes it a dubious choice. Combine that with the fact that their system blows (biased towards the front wheels... not nearly as advanced as subaru or mitsu) and, oddly enough, we're lucky they didn't go that route. the car's cheaper, lighter and faster this way... the 'feel' of awd apparently wouldn't have been that much different so... what's the point?