Hey did anyone else catch the 5 on Motorweek a couple of Saturdays back?
If not, here ya go...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nYGnBlVD9g
If not, here ya go...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nYGnBlVD9g
"...Interior materials are of solid quality..."
This is incorrect...
this stuff is strange, yes, but fit and finish is great.
True - I only paid $16,500 for my Sport with 3 years 0% financing. That's why I call the Mazda5 the great compromise - great design layout, good gas mileage, relatively fun to drive, but really cheap interior plastic, wheel issues, and expensive keys. Overall though, for the price, it is a very good car. But the interior plastic is pathetic.I would agree. Interior is not of high quality, but this is an entry level 'mini-van' or space wagon as my kids call it...
Wait a second, Mazda used a lower quality plastic for the Sports, or do the Sports just have more of the plastic?+1, Of course is not the best quality plastic (looks platicky, specially the Sports)...
True - I only paid $16,500 for my Sport with 3 years 0% financing. That's why I call the Mazda5 the great compromise - great design layout, good gas mileage, relatively fun to drive, but really cheap interior plastic, wheel issues, and expensive keys. Overall though, for the price, it is a very good car. But the interior plastic is pathetic.
Wait a second, Mazda used a lower quality plastic for the Sports, or do the Sports just have more of the plastic?
Wait a second, Mazda used a lower quality plastic for the Sports, or do the Sports just have more of the plastic?
But as somebody mentioned earlier, just look at the price of a Sienna. Last time I parked next to one which still had the dealer window sticker, my wife laughed and said: "hey you can buy 2 of these for the price of one of those, and these ones look better"![]()
Fortunately, not all Siennas are that expensive. In the US, the price difference between a base Sienna and a base 5 is about $6k. This drops to $5k if you opt for the automatic transmission in the 5.
As for build quality -- initially, I really thought Mazda did a nice job. After 15 months of ownership, I'd say that I've never driven a car that had more annoying noises (squeaks, creaks and crunches) than the 5 -- not even a 15 year old Chevy Blazer. Even a worn-out pinion bearing in that truck (at 197,000 miles) caused less vibration than the 5 has with "balanced" factory tires @ 50 mph.
I actually rented a Sienna, check the report, it was OK, but not really a wow thing:
http://www.mazdas247.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123688195.
Eeegads! I didn't realize it was so slow! I thought it was a 9 second 0-60 / 16.4 second 1/4 miler.