yesiownaskyline said:kbichw- youre partially right. The A320 is fly by wire, BUT only on flight surfaces (rudder, lifters, flaps, steering, etc...). Landing gear is a mechanical surface, and is still controlled by good ole' hydraulics. The problem that the nose gear encountered is unusual, but in the two previous cases, the cause was lack of maintenance on the hydrolic seals. While technically Airbus doesnt design their planes to fall into a 90 degree wheel position on malfunction, it will happen 100% of the time in failures. The reasoning is because the steering surface is a 180 degree range, thus the most it can rotate is 90 both ways...
I stand corrected.
yesiownaskyline said:As for the way it would have turned out if the gear was stuck at an odd angle, say 45 degreees, you are definitely right, BUT the excessive oversteer forces can be overcome by using imbalanced thrust of the engines. Basically, imagine going into an oversteer situation in a car, but being able to control both L and R sides independently with 800hp engines respectively. The forces needed to overcome oversteer and continue (semi) straight would be there, just be a bit more difficult to control. We practiced this in flight SIM's regularly in training.
I was thinking the same thing and was pretty sure that this was possible. Though, my lack of knowledge in aviation principles and technique is nearly nil.
Thanks for the clarification!