Is the Roadmagnet springs lower than the h&r springs?

[09speed3]

I am currently using the roadmagnet springs on my mazdaspeed 3 with 18x8 +48 offset rims with the stock 215/45/18 tires and my tires in the rear tuck which i do not like so i was wondering if the h&r's are not as low as the roadmagnets in the rear or in the front any help would be very appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

 

[walti]

I have the roadmagnets as well. From the pics I've seen of h&r, it looks like the roadmagnet's front drop look like the h&r's drop all around.

 

[09speed3]

Thats what I was thinking but couldnt figure it out because everyone says H&R lower them the most. And then people say H&R mess up your shocks yet Roadmagnet is even lower (in the rear) and know one really says it about them.

 

[walti]

Any springs that lower the car will deteriorate the life of the shocks faster. But you are right, I have seen more H&R owners complain about blown shocks than Roadmagnet owners. Must be luck I guess? (knocks on wood)

 

[RichB]

from what i've read the road magnets lower the car 1.1" and the H&Rs lower 1.5"

 

[ericrapp]

Also the Cobbs advertise 1 inch and they say that is within the shock/strut ability. And my struts are good after about 15000. My rears never sat down as much as the front though.

 

[RichB]

i'm lookin to get my wheels lined up with the fenders. Any suggestions anyone?

 

[blkspeed]

digging this back up cause i want to know if any one has proof that the roadmagnets are lower than the h&r? cause i want the lowest drop possible