desperado-c
Member
- :
- Mazdaspeed3
Mazda does not warrant hydrolock that's my point. It may not be stated at all times but it is implied.
I have heard a lot about implied warranties and nothing about implied exclusions. I don't think they exist.
I know for a fact it was explicitly stated in my MS Cai documentation.
Also most people put on the MS-CAI after delivery so even the limited powertrain warranty doesn't apply.
Agreed, I'm simply saying there is a case where the general warranty does apply and that without a written exclusion, hydrolock should be covered.
And even when it does apply, there are conditions. One is 'normal use' as stated in the above page you quoted. 'Normal use' covers a whole lot of situations - driving through high water/abuse/neglect/ etc. ....
Driving through a big puddle or lake and sucking water into the engine is not normal use. Now an insurance company may or may not cover that, but like I said before, that's a whole different matter.
If the general warranty applies and there is no written exclusion provided to the buyer, then the dealer/Mazda would have to rely on the normal use provision. Have you ever heard of a water crossing? There are several right near my house. At least one has a gate that closes when the water is too high. I'm not sure that when the gate is up the water is always low enough to avoid hydrolock. Similarly, we get flash floods. There might well be dips in the road that will temporarily fill up with water that is not dangerous to cross, but could still cause hydrolock. In both cases, a car could safely go across the water and it would be "normal use." It just so happens that it could also cause hydrolock with a CAI.