GM Declares Bankruptcy Imminent After $4.2 Billion Third Quarter Loss

TinmanMS6

Member
:
2012 Subaru WRX
GM today announced a third-quarter loss of $4.2 billion on revenues of $37 billion while spending $6.9 billion of their lifeblood-like cash on hand. Although initially we thought the big news here was a cash spend of $2.3 billion per month, compared to around $1.1 billion a month in the previous quarter, but the real story is that GM basically acknowledged what we said first last month that bankruptcy is imminent (and we might add, were laughed at by some members of the auto intelligentsia for it) — as close as the end of the year if GM doesn't receive help.

Why is the cash burn rate so important? GM isn't exactly cash rich and needs to have at least $10 billion to operate and currently has around $15.8 billion on hand. This means that if the current trend continues the company will be unable to operate in approximately three months, meaning that they'll have to declare bankruptcy as we previously outlined. GM itself basically admits this themselves saying:

"Even if GM implements the planned operating actions that are substantially within its control, GM's estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with its planned actions, the company's estimated liquidity will fall significantly short of that amount unless economic and automotive industry conditions significantly improve, it receives substantial proceeds from asset sales, takes more aggressive working capital initiatives, gains access to capital markets and other private sources of funding, receives government funding under one or more current or future programs, or some combination of the foregoing."
To summarize: give us some money or we're going to go bankrupt and the economy will have to grapple with the horror of hundreds of thousands of unemployed workers. Announcement from General Motors below.

GM Reports Third Quarter Financial Results

DETROIT –General Motors (NYSE: GM) today announced its financial results for the third quarter of 2008, reflecting rapidly deteriorating market conditions in the U.S., slowdowns in other mature markets around the world, and continued losses at GMAC Financial Services (GMAC).

threeqrev.jpg


During the third quarter the turmoil in the global credit markets resulted in the worst financial crisis in more than 70 years. The upheaval has had a dramatic impact on the auto business in particular, especially in the U.S. and Western Europe.

Tight credit, rising unemployment, declining income, falling stock markets, and continuing deterioration in the housing market in the U.S., resulted in an abrupt halt in consumer spending, with most consumers exiting the vehicle market. Many of those still intending to purchase vehicles were denied financing, or found the cost of financing prohibitive.

“The third quarter was especially challenging for the auto industry. Consumer spending, which represents close to 70 percent of the U.S. economy, fell dramatically, and the abrupt closure of credit markets created a downward spiral in vehicle sales,” said Rick Wagoner, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “The U.S. government’s actions to help stabilize the credit markets and eventually ease the credit crunch are an essential first step to the economy’s and the auto industry’s recovery, but further strong action is required.”

GM reported a net loss of $2.5 billion or $4.45 per share for the third quarter, including special items. That compares with a net loss from continuing operations of $42.5 billion or $75.12 per share in the third quarter of 2007, which included a non-cash charge of $38.3 billion to establish a valuation allowance against some of the company’s net deferred tax assets.

On an adjusted basis, GM posted a net loss of $4.2 billion or $7.35 per share, compared with a net loss from continuing operations of $1.6 billion or $2.86 per share in the same period last year.

Revenue for the third quarter was $37.9 billion, down from $43.7 billion in the year-ago quarter, reflecting dramatic sales declines across the industry driven by unstable market conditions, instability in the credit markets and dramatic retraction in consumer demand, especially in North America and Europe.

GM recorded net favorable charges of $1.7 billion for special items in the third quarter. Included in the charges was a curtailment gain of $4.9 billion resulting from the UAW Settlement Agreement becoming effective. The curtailment represents the accelerated recognition of net prior service credits, largely relating to the 2005 GM UAW healthcare agreement, scheduled for amortization after January 1, 2010.

The curtailment was recorded because GM's UAW retiree health plan will not exist after January 1, 2010, and therefore no further basis for deferring unamortized prior service credits exists beyond that date. The $4.9 billion curtailment gain was partially offset by a non-cash $1.7 billion settlement charge related to the elimination of post-65 salaried retiree healthcare coverage, including the cost of increased pension benefits that were announced in July as part of GM’s operating actions to improve liquidity as well as the recognition of accumulated deferred losses related to the healthcare plan.

In addition, GM reported charges of $652 million relating to its commitments as part of Delphi’s bankruptcy proceedings, $251 million for impairment of investments in GMAC, and $641 million in restructuring-related and other charges. Details on these and all other special items are in the financial highlights section of this release.

GM Automotive Operations

GM reports its automotive operations and regional results on an earnings-before-tax basis, with taxes reported on a total corporate basis.

GM recorded an adjusted automotive loss of $2.8 billion ($947 million reported loss) in the third quarter 2008. The loss compares with adjusted automotive earnings from continuing operations of $98 million in the third quarter of 2007 (reported net loss of $1.6 billion).

The results reflect losses in GM North America (GMNA) driven largely by the U.S. industry volume decline of nearly 20 percent, and shifts in product mix. In addition, Europe saw rapid auto market contraction, leading to sharply lower GM Europe (GME) sales volume in the third quarter. GM Asia Pacific (GMAP) results were down due to commodity hedging charges and moderating demand in key markets including China, Australia and India. These losses were partially offset by very strong results in the GM Latin America, Africa and Middle East (GMLAAM) region.

GM’s automotive results in the third quarter include $1.5 billion of expenses related to mark-to-market changes in the value of GM’s commodity and foreign exchange hedging contracts, due almost entirely to falling commodity prices.

GM sold 2.1 million vehicles worldwide in the third quarter, down 11 percent year over year. Sales in GMNA were down 19 percent compared to third quarter 2007. GM global market share was 13 percent, down 0.7 percentage points compared with the third quarter of 2007, due largely to weakness in North America and Western Europe.

Cash and Liquidity

Cash, marketable securities, and readily-available assets of the Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust totaled $16.2 billion on September 30, 2008, down from $21.0 billion on June 30, 2008.

The change in liquidity reflects negative adjusted operating cash flow of $6.9 billion in the third quarter 2008, driven by the industry-wide slowdown in vehicle demand and compounding credit crisis, especially in North America and Europe. During the quarter, GM drew the remaining $3.5 billion of its secured revolving credit facility and made $1.2 billion in payments to Delphi as required by agreements between the companies as part of Delphi’s bankruptcy proceedings.

GM expects adjusted operating cash flow in the fourth quarter to be much improved versus the third quarter, and more consistent with the first half of the year. Improvements in fourth quarter cash flow are largely driven by anticipated improvements in working capital in North America relating to sales allowances, and lower fourth quarter finished vehicle inventory in Europe.

Improving its liquidity position remains a top priority for the company. In response to deteriorating market conditions, GM announced today that in addition to the $15 billion in liquidity initiatives it outlined in July 2008, it has identified $5 billion of incremental liquidity actions. Cumulatively, GM has announced actions aimed at improving liquidity by $20 billion through 2009. To date, $10 billion in internal operating actions have either already been completed or are on track for full execution by the end of 2009.

Even if GM implements the planned operating actions that are substantially within its control, GM's estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with its planned actions, the company's estimated liquidity will fall significantly short of that amount unless economic and automotive industry conditions significantly improve, it receives substantial proceeds from asset sales, takes more aggressive working capital initiatives, gains access to capital markets and other private sources of funding, receives government funding under one or more current or future programs, or some combination of the foregoing. The success of GM's plans necessarily depends on other factors, including global economic conditions and the level of automotive sales, particularly in the United States and Western Europe.
 
nana na na...nana na na hey hey hey goodbye...

LOL this will be funny to see. I somewhat feel bad for the countless thousands of GM employees that will be affected by this, but hell, this is what happens when unions become greedy.
 
Bankruptcy != Out of business

If GM filed bankruptcy, they'd be free of most of their previous debts, including commitments to the unions and any money owed to suppliers--obviously this is oversimplified, but that's the general idea. The unions and suppliers would be ******. GM would be in good shape. I think they should be filing bankruptcy, not asking for gov't handouts.
 
yea i know, the company my dad works for filed protection bankrupcy, i was just being overdramatic. I hope this finally wakes up the blue collar worker that they CANNOT take advantage of company's by jerkin around lobbyists to bully companies into bending at the waist and taking it in the arse...I'm sorry but you do not deserve 75K+ for screwing together a car on a mostly mechanized assembly line.

Oh and the last time i went on a tour of the GM plant east of me, I swear on my soul that no less than half of the people were sitting on their asses. I have heard from a couple family members that brag about being on the clock getting paid when they're not even @ the plant!

Hopefully this wakes people up.

However, I will say management should give up some of their benefits, bonuses and such during hard times like this.

Oh well
 
"Even if GM implements the planned operating actions that are substantially within its control, GM's estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business."

This is why Chapter 11 (restructuring) must happen for GM. C11 allows them to cancel contracts with suppliers, unions, franchises without further financial obligation. They can focus on the core aspects of the business such as making good cars instead of worrying how they're going to make next month's payroll.

Restructuring will allow GM to sell assets like factories to Audi, who the other day admitted they need domestic US production facilities in order to make sales & profit goals. GM could cut brands since the franchise agreements with dealers is a current roadblock there. I would hope to see a very quick move to 3 brands (from the current 8) to Chevy for cars & crossovers; GMC for trucks & truck-based SUVs; Cadillac for luxury cars. In the USDM all other brands will cease to exist.

The only form of government bailout (loan) I would like to see would be to offset the development costs of true alternative-energy vehicles such as the Volt.
 
thats their fault for making bad cars.

Good point

My gf had a chevy cobalt when here mazda6 was getting repaired after her wreck and my god that thing was a POS!!! Loud, rough, uncomfortable and just all around miserable even for an entry level car. It was like driving my friend's 1989 Toyota
 
It won't be funny to see, the economy will get f-ed up even more.

What would also suck is if your turbo Cobalt threw a rod and you tried to go in for warranty only to find the GM dealerships all closed down.
 
"Even if GM implements the planned operating actions that are substantially within its control, GM's estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business."

This is why Chapter 11 (restructuring) must happen for GM. C11 allows them to cancel contracts with suppliers, unions, franchises without further financial obligation. They can focus on the core aspects of the business such as making good cars instead of worrying how they're going to make next month's payroll.

Restructuring will allow GM to sell assets like factories to Audi, who the other day admitted they need domestic US production facilities in order to make sales & profit goals. GM could cut brands since the franchise agreements with dealers is a current roadblock there. I would hope to see a very quick move to 3 brands (from the current 8) to Chevy for cars & crossovers; GMC for trucks & truck-based SUVs; Cadillac for luxury cars. In the USDM all other brands will cease to exist.

The only form of government bailout (loan) I would like to see would be to offset the development costs of true alternative-energy vehicles such as the Volt.

Have you EVER thought of just walking into GM's headquarters and saying, I'll fix your problems?

That's absolutely brilliant mate :) *applaud*
 
It won't be funny to see, the economy will get f-ed up even more.

What would also suck is if your turbo Cobalt threw a rod and you tried to go in for warranty only to find the GM dealerships all closed down.

it wouldnt do squat to the economy :P the demand for GM cars would just shift to other brands thus maintaining the cash flows, the only thing that would suck is the tens of thousands of new welfare recipients
 
Consider everyone that profits from GM being in business. Dealerships employ accountants, salesmen, mechanics, secretarys, managers. Don't forget about factories. Everyone of those people have rent/mortagages, bills, kids, etc. If they are out of a job and can't pay their bills, they lose their houses. Those possible foreclosures bring down the value of homes in that city. Those unemployed are not shopping and adding money into the economy, thus the economy is f'ed up even more.

Like it or not, we are better off with GM here.

However, I do agree with NVP5White about restructuring as to keep GM from bleeding money out of every orifice.
 
Consider everyone that profits from GM being in business. Dealerships employ accountants, salesmen, mechanics, secretarys, managers. Don't forget about factories. Everyone of those people have rent/mortagages, bills, kids, etc. If they are out of a job and can't pay their bills, they lose their houses. Those possible foreclosures bring down the value of homes in that city. Those unemployed are not shopping and adding money into the economy, thus the economy is f'ed up even more.

Like it or not, we are better off with GM here.

This is an interesting question to consider. If all of these people are employed making something no one wants, using scarce financial, energy and material resources in the process, are we really better off? While the short-term pain will be measurable, the long-term benefit of having the hundreds of thousands of skilled and white-collar workers actually being productive members of society far outweighs the short-term costs.

Besides, restructuring GM would mean that not all factories would close; not all dealers would close; and not all white-collar jobs would go away. A smaller, stronger GM would eventually prosper in the USDM. Besides, they would still have a strong international business which they could utilize for outsourced engineering work, just as they did with the Chevy Malibu (Opal Astra) and Chevy Cruze/Volt (Opal Zafira). These chassis were designed in Europe with conversion to USDM standards in mind. We already know GM's international operations are profitable with these design costs factored in so GM could continue to leach engineering resources from their international divisions and be successful in the long term.
 
I'm no GM fan, but auto manufacturing is one of the few industries that the US has left. Industry used to be how we could boost our GDP to avoid and pay off debt, but that is less and less the case anymore. GM going out of business would be a death blow to the US economy...certainly they need to downsize a ton and it's going to hurt, but the alternative is going to be horrendous.

This Chrysler merger talk makes me even more nervous...why would a nearly bankrupt company with too many models purchase another nearly bankrupt company with inventory control problems and excessive dealerships, not to mention cars that no one wants? Yikes. Ford looks like they may be in the best shape of anyone to survive this.
 
Well said!

I'd hire you in a second.(bowdown)

Thanks. I'm reading John DeLorean's book On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors and it is an incredibly prescient tales of the current GM situation. Or rather, it describes the management psychopathy that leads to such a long, focused destruction of an enormous corporation. Its really pretty rare that a company the size of GM is able to run itself into the ground. I sincerely believe that GM management is culpable for its current condition. I would estimate that 0% of the fault lies with the current economic and/or financial climate. The economy and financial conditions simply accelerated by a few months (maybe 12 months) an inevitable conclusion.

DeLorean was an incredibly successful young engineer who eventually lead the Pontiac division during its heyday. He is credited with the development of the turn signal and the Pontiac GTO, the first American muscle car.

He was an engineer through and through (although he did earn his MBA) and was constantly seeking to improve the GM product. I am only part way through the book but he has already described several instances where GM management failed to listen to the engineers in favor of greater profits. The most famous case is that of the Chevy Corvair. Wikipedia glosses over the impact of this car. The Corvair was one of the very first products Ralph Nader came out against. The prolonged and very public battle with GM made Nader into the public figure he is today.

So, before GM began production it was learned that the swing axle rear suspension caused a dangerously high role center. DeLorean wanted to add a swaybar that would made the car safe but also would have increased production costs by $35 per vehicle. GM executives refused on the grounds that it would erode profit and potentially delay production. They did decide to make an adjustment to the air pressure in the front tires. It was set very low at 15psi to 19psi so that the car would understeer before cornering forces built sufficient to flip the car. Of course, most people don;t read the manual and began to set air pressures at the industry standard 32psi which made the car unsafe again.

So, two years into production GM had over 100 lawsuits pending because the Corvair had lost control and resulted in grave bodily harm. Even some top GM executives had lost family members. When Nader brought this situation to the media GM tapped his phones and hired PI's to trail him 24 hours per day. GM's tactics eventually came to light and they agreed to settle with Nader.

Anyway, DeLorean makes it clear that as individuals executives at GM were not bad people. But as an organization, one that placed revenue and profit above all, GM was dangerous and grossly incompetent at making good automobiles.

Flash forward to 2008, I don't see much change in GM executives. Rick Wagner just today blamed the current "unforeseeable" market conditions on GM's poorly performance. My friends, the Titanic did not go down instantly. The iceberg for GM was their failure to realize that giant truck-based SUV's were a fad. They totally abandoned small and mid-sized car markets. They let their SUV's rot away to nothing. They rushed development of the GMT-900 platform at great engineering and financial expense. This was in 2005 when Katrina caused gas prices to pike above $3 for the first time since the 70's (adjusted for inflation). This general trend continued with the poor showing with the Chevy Colorado/Equinox vehicles. When they realized gas prices were causing a shift in the type of vehicles people buy (i.e. smaller) they canceled development of their next generation RWD car platform. This was mere months before the Chevy Camaro concept car made such a big splash. After realocating engineering and financial resources GM had to scramble to develope a new platform basically from scratch. In the mean time, the only new RWD cars have been imports from their Holden division in Australia (G8 and GTO).

Okay, too many words...you get the idea (I hope).
 
This Chrysler merger talk makes me even more nervous...

Merger talks have ended as of late yesterday (Thursday). GM has [probably] received guidance from the Government that it would not be a good idea to involve a bloodsucking hedge fund (Cerberus) in its future plans if it wants a bailout/loan.

In any event, GM folding is probably not an option, as you indicate and for the reasons you indicate. The question becomes, under what conditions with GM get federal assistance? The better option is under C11 bankruptcy. This would screw suppliers, at least the ones they no longer use, factory workers and dealers. Of course, good medicine often tastes bad...
 
Merger talks have ended as of late yesterday (Thursday). GM has [probably] received guidance from the Government that it would not be a good idea to involve a bloodsucking hedge fund (Cerberus) in its future plans if it wants a bailout/loan.

I didn't hear that, but I'm glad...what amazes me is that someone thought it was a good idea in the first place!
 
Restructuring will allow GM to sell assets like factories to Audi, who the other day admitted they need domestic US production facilities in order to make sales & profit goals. GM could cut brands since the franchise agreements with dealers is a current roadblock there. I would hope to see a very quick move to 3 brands (from the current 8) to Chevy for cars & crossovers; GMC for trucks & truck-based SUVs; Cadillac for luxury cars. In the USDM all other brands will cease to exist.

The problem selling plants to Audi or any other manufacturer is that they will have to completely upgraded to their specs. Compare American plants with German or Japanese plants. The American plants are very outdated were the others are state of the art.
 
Last edited:

New Threads and Articles

Back