Just to hoenest up a bit I am for the most part F-ing around but I do definitly realize the massive ness of the situation.
On one hand
- we have a, at best, evil mother F-er that kills hundreds of thousands of poeple a year and is despereratly seeking the ability to accomplish that task far more efficently.
- His main goal is the distruction of one of our greatest allies and definitly our best in the area.
- He is totaly unrational and answers for nothing and to no one.
- His country is in complete fear of him and will never stand against him no matter his action. NOt to say everyone in his country as many rebel and most die for doing so.
- He has already forcefully occupied and razed another country wioth care of international law or those who in enforce it.
- With the UN, basicly which becames the US's action against him was the only meathod to remove him from the occupied territory.
- Even with constant survailance nothing has changed his attempts at further reaching his goals.
- He was not in throned or impowered by the US.
- The US gained no favor from him in any way even after aiding the guarentee of his power.
- Sanctions of every variety have been tried for over 12 years with no result other then innocent death.
- Sanctions have proved utterly useless in that he in no way cares who dies as a result of his actions.
- It is all but guarenteed that he has been developing weapons of mass destruction.
- From past experience we know his troops we for the most part surender.
Other Hand.
- there is no definit proof yet as of his creating weapons of mass destruction.
- He does not care who he kills so he will march as many epople at an invader as he can.
- He will most likely use innocent people as a shield if he has too.
- His soilders were armed and trained by the US.
- Any troops used if he does have weapons of mass destruction he will use them if anyone invades with no regard for the innocents killed.
- For the most part Western style imposed governemets have proved un successful in the long run.
- US is the only action pushing state an unilateral action has mosstly the potential to worsen te views of the US in the Geo-Political world.
- Many states such as France, has a very large Muslim population that are opposed to any action against Iraq.
- Some states are justifiably concered about prevoking more terrorist attacks.
Did I miss anything?
Notice I list no corse of action. I am intelliganet enough to know the proper decision in this situation is far out of my mental ability to determine. I am a car audio installer and Control systems programmer not a tactical genouis or geo-political analyst.
For the most part all of us on the boards are not even close to qualified to make a decision on this that anyone in a position of power would or should pay attention to. This doesn't negate our opinions however.
And for anyone that try to mention I called countries a State, you just proved you don't know s*** about Gobal-politics.
On one hand
- we have a, at best, evil mother F-er that kills hundreds of thousands of poeple a year and is despereratly seeking the ability to accomplish that task far more efficently.
- His main goal is the distruction of one of our greatest allies and definitly our best in the area.
- He is totaly unrational and answers for nothing and to no one.
- His country is in complete fear of him and will never stand against him no matter his action. NOt to say everyone in his country as many rebel and most die for doing so.
- He has already forcefully occupied and razed another country wioth care of international law or those who in enforce it.
- With the UN, basicly which becames the US's action against him was the only meathod to remove him from the occupied territory.
- Even with constant survailance nothing has changed his attempts at further reaching his goals.
- He was not in throned or impowered by the US.
- The US gained no favor from him in any way even after aiding the guarentee of his power.
- Sanctions of every variety have been tried for over 12 years with no result other then innocent death.
- Sanctions have proved utterly useless in that he in no way cares who dies as a result of his actions.
- It is all but guarenteed that he has been developing weapons of mass destruction.
- From past experience we know his troops we for the most part surender.
Other Hand.
- there is no definit proof yet as of his creating weapons of mass destruction.
- He does not care who he kills so he will march as many epople at an invader as he can.
- He will most likely use innocent people as a shield if he has too.
- His soilders were armed and trained by the US.
- Any troops used if he does have weapons of mass destruction he will use them if anyone invades with no regard for the innocents killed.
- For the most part Western style imposed governemets have proved un successful in the long run.
- US is the only action pushing state an unilateral action has mosstly the potential to worsen te views of the US in the Geo-Political world.
- Many states such as France, has a very large Muslim population that are opposed to any action against Iraq.
- Some states are justifiably concered about prevoking more terrorist attacks.
Did I miss anything?
Notice I list no corse of action. I am intelliganet enough to know the proper decision in this situation is far out of my mental ability to determine. I am a car audio installer and Control systems programmer not a tactical genouis or geo-political analyst.
For the most part all of us on the boards are not even close to qualified to make a decision on this that anyone in a position of power would or should pay attention to. This doesn't negate our opinions however.
And for anyone that try to mention I called countries a State, you just proved you don't know s*** about Gobal-politics.