harsh man, harsh.
the fusion: weird rear styling but a massive improvment over the taurus.. plus it's just a 6 in disguise
the 500: a big, comfy family cruiser. a decent replacement for the crown vic aside from the fact that it's not as well suited for fleet duty as I doubt it's as easily/cheaply serviceable
the F150: a good looking truck, seems to sell very well, must be pretty reliable as I've never heard bad things about it.
the explorer: independent rear suspension ftw. the styling is pretty nice, interior is nice, and if the reliability is good then it's a great SUV.. not that anyone really needs one of those
the expedition: just a supersized explorer.. really doesn't deserve to be on the road, they are such a big hazardous pile of waste
the edge: smaller than I thought it would be, strange that it looks like the size of the CX-7 but it's the platform that the CX-9 is on. really cool styling, I like it a lot.
the mustang: cheap american muscle. handles better than any previous mustang (not that it's too hard to achieve that).. styling is meh ok I guess.
the focus: absolute hellish torture that we don't have the euro Focus ST.
the ranger: and absolutely ancient platform, other than the steering wheel and seats (and maybe door panels) the interior hasn't changed a bit since 1995. The 4.0 Cologne V6 is potent, reliable, and decently fuel efficient. It's a compact truck, what do you want from it? Yeah, the Tacoma is much more modern, but is it reall that much better? Plus, the 4-cyl 2wd rangers are ridiculously cheap, not even counting the massive incentives I'm sure they have on them. simple utility ftw.
all in all the current model lineup is really decent. much more than I can say about the current Chrysler lineup (sebring, the next gen of the vans, aspen, durango, nitro, caliber, super bee charger, challenger, dakota, etc) (blarf)(blarf)(blarf)(blarf)(blarf)(blarf)