Hi guys looking to get a DP for my MS3, But was wondering if a should go with A HFC one or not. Thought I read on here about boost creap with out a HFC?? Also WTH is a long DP and a Short DP??
there was a great article in Import Tuner about a year ago or so. It posed the question of High Flow Cat vs Test Pipe. They ran the stock cat, a HFC, and a TP. Regardless of what the gains were in total. It was the difference in TP to HFC that was more interesting. They could only find a loss of less than a HP to the wheels between the HFC to the TP. I run a TP on my S2000, but if I do get parts for the MS3, I will go for the HFC.
(also, if you get a bung extension, you wont have to deal with CEL codes)
Fun attical, BTW I have seen the WHP from test pipes to HFS where minimal like2whp difference. I'm concerned about the CEL and boost creap.Any have issues with these??
People have success with both catless and catted downpipes. I have the Cobb downpipe which is catted. For Cobb maps it seems to work better than non cated, But a custom tune solves that. There is not too much difference power-wise with hfc dp vs catless dp..around 5 whp from what I recal with the CP-E downpipes...as for test pipe vs downpipe..I saw s2000 mentioned..with turbo cars its just way different story than n/a cars for exhaust mods..The downpipe part of the exhaust on the ms3 is what holds most power back..the midpipe=testpipe will yield some quicker turbo spool and a decent gain of hp. Typicaly its understood in the ms3 world that downpipes give 20-30 whp and the testpipe 7-10. Goodluck