Frisco speed3
Member
- :
- 2008.5 ms3
Just got my ms3 an I was wondering which is better for our car?
It took only 4 days for this thread to start again, not too bad. This is the best question ever asked... Its like groundhog day and still everyone answers. I can't wait to buy my next car so I can ask this question.. again. Awesome. Maybe then someone can convince me to buy the CAI. Dang, I just can't wait.....
I couldn't help it. It was like I could tell the future!!!
And I won't be that punk, that tells you to use Search, because that's just mean. Welcome to the Boards! Enjoy your stay. And check out Drake13's contributions to the Forum, it makes it that much more palatable:
http://www.mazdas247.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111465&page=160
Congrats on the MS3!!
Both types of intakes perform with similar results on our car. It really ends up being a matter of preference. No matter what, ANY intake upgrade on our car makes a HUGE difference. The only thing that matters is make sure you get an intake with a dry filter (i.e. one that doesn't require oil). Intakes that use oil filters mess up the MAF sensor.
Good options for both types of intake:
SRI: COBB
CAI: AEM, CPE, INJEN
Agreed about the oil filters. Used em for a long time on MAF cars no issues unless you're dumb.
sri vs. cai = you won't tell the difference hp wise.
Sri is super easy to install, I did mine at 10:00pm in a parking lot in 15 minutes.
THe Cobb sounds awsome Btw.
I understand that you CAN use an oil filter, but it is not the recommended type of filter when you have a MAF sensor...there is just less to worry about if you have a dry filter. Either way, I think we need to close this thread and leave it at the fact that CAI/SRI is all personal preference. This debate never stops because there is no definitive answer either way, and BOTH make huge gains on the MS3. BOTH are a good option.