Any photographers in here?

3151818059
 
2684979284_c266ac9d45.jpg


My buddy Jim when we went on a road trip to Yellowstone in the summer. Long exposure and pretty much told him to sit still
2684119409_e33e469e2c.jpg
 
Last edited:
I always had a hard time getting those long exposure water shots. I finally picked up a ND filter. Now I gotta find time to try it out.
 
I always had a hard time getting those long exposure water shots. I finally picked up a ND filter. Now I gotta find time to try it out.


Use the ND filter to bump the exposure down so you can use a slow enough shutter speed during broad daylight or else you'd have to wait till it's almost dark out, which is what I did.
 
Use the ND filter to bump the exposure down so you can use a slow enough shutter speed during broad daylight or else you'd have to wait till it's almost dark out, which is what I did.

yup. :D

2458010415_d0a24fc889_b.jpg

yes, I see the dirt/dust. I dont know how to get it out. I bought a camera cleaning kit and tried blowing it out but its still there. nothing I do can get those out. :(
earlier attempts..
I over saturated this one to compensate for the blurriness
2417346775_909d6903e0_b.jpg

and all the back to my first attempt. No tripod = noob!

2397381060_88ed886666_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
yup. :D


yes, I see the dirt/dust. I dont know how to get it out. I bought a camera cleaning kit and tried blowing it out but its still there. nothing I do can get those out. :(
earlier attempts..
I over saturated this one to compensate for the blurriness

and all the back to my first attempt. No tripod = noob!


Your sensor needs cleaning for sure.
 
Happy New Year everyone!

I am catching up going through the last few pages of shots and see some very good images.

couple self-portraits playing around with the strobes

img0166fo0.jpg

AWDTerror,

Congratulations on getting the sweet AB set-up. I have just a few comments to make on the shots you posted. First, as a general work flow critique: the majority of your images appear underexposed on my monitor. Since I have calibrated my monitor with a HW calibrator I am inclined to conclude that your monitor may need to be calibrated. It is also possible that you were going for a dark and mysterious look for some of your shots, but I don't think that's what it is.

Regarding the self portraits: the lighting is nice and soft but you kind of appear to be coming out of the carbonite; a phrase I use to describe a scene lit without the use of a hair/rim light. Placing a bare strobe at low power directly behind you, or a gobo'ed strobe just out of the picture camera right, would provide much needed separation of the subject from the dark background. Since you have the equipment you might as well...Also consider putting a colored gel on that back light.

EDIT: My own Coming out of the Carbonite image

Steve-&-Amy-Wedding-3831-2.jpg


Of course, these look underexposed to me, too. I highly (highly!) recommend you shoot in a RAW format and process starting with Adobe Lightroom. This work flow will allow you to recover from under/over exposure while still getting good shots. While you are learning there are going to be many times you just don't get all of the elements (exposure, composition, facial expression, lighting, etc) to come together just right. Using RAW will allow you to control for at least a few of those variables.
 
Last edited:
Here are two from the other day.

Lighting Info: Nikon SB-600 flash through a white umbrella above camera right. 42" reflector camera left. The subject is standing about 18" from the background which allowed it to be illuminated by the key light.

Eric-5246.jpg


Eric-5271.jpg
 
img0187wb2.jpg


I took this the same day, playing around with a sample gel pack.
The above pictures were taken with one light in a medium sized soft box.
I was going for the dark and mysterious look. I also have my monitors calibrated.

And I shoot in RAW.

img0037xd1.jpg

3 ABs
one in a large soft box
one hair light
one background light
 
Last edited:
Sweet, so I guess we're tracking...

BTW, are you familiar with strobist.com and their associated flickr group/discussion? Lots of good information over there.
 
Sweet, so I guess we're tracking...

BTW, are you familiar with strobist.com and their associated flickr group/discussion? Lots of good information over there.


yes TONS of good info. I still get a kick out of the 12 580 exII "gang light"....
on your pictures there seems to be not enough contrast, a "stonewashed" effect. Is that what you were going for?
 
Last edited:
yes TONS of good info. I still get a kick out of the 12 580 exII "gang light"....
on your pictures there seems to be not enough contrast, a "stonewashed" effect. Is that what you were going for?

Strobist is the temple and we are the minions LOL
 
yes TONS of good info. I still get a kick out of the 12 580 exII "gang light"....
on your pictures there seems to be not enough contrast, a "stonewashed" effect. Is that what you were going for?

I'm not sure you meant "contrast" as I believe there is plenty, especially the couple pictured in my original post. If anything, there is way too much contrast in that image.

Maybe you meant "saturation" in the two images with my brother? I agree that the image appears desaturated but I believe that is somewhat of an optical illusion given the similarity in shade and tone between the subject's clothing (the sweatshirt as well as the "rose" and "cheese" elements on the shirt) and the background. In reality the saturation has been amplified to a small degree in post.
 
eric5271fp6.jpg

slight boost in contrast

there seems to be a gray haze on your pictures.
also got rid of the vignetting
 
I hope you don't mind some editing of the pics.
funky: i though so to, they looked ok though. it was done using a kubota action on my sis comp(calibrated mac). I'm kinda on the fence about them, some of them work great, others not so much, what do you guys think on kubota actions?

ETA:Sorry, I should have asked permission before I edited them. Pictures removed until further.
 
Last edited:
Back