Hot air balloon saw what you did and does not approve.
Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 by Vocko, on Flickr
After 24h with this lens... Tiny Nikon 18-55 is better build quality in the long run, I dont like that focus ring turns, there's no AF/MF it's either one or the other and it's a bit "stiff" when you want to zoom-in, doesnt "glide" like Nikon. Aparat from that, I'm satisfied. Pics look good and sharp, but there is some color fringing that can be seen when zoomed in 100%.
Considering that Nikons counterpart @f2.8 costs three times more, here at least, I'm very satisfied.
Next stop Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 in the long term...
I have the Canon mount version of this lens and I agree with the build quality. The end of the lens where the hood mounds on mine seems almost loose and rattles.
How long did you have it/used it before it happened?
Wow that looks easy. Thanks.
Thanks. It's actually a pedestrian bridge over that street. There's a school near there so the kids have to have some way to cross. Been using that bridge for like 18 years now. Good times.^ That's awesome. How'd you get in that spot?
Thanks. It's actually a pedestrian bridge over that street. There's a school near there so the kids have to have some way to cross. Been using that bridge for like 18 years now. Good times.
Don't lie....you used levitation.....
thanks bud, can say the same with your work though! agree with you on the crampedness..the lighting above that point was harsh however..plus loved the position of that rock in the foreground and was maxed out at 10mm :/ need to start looking into the 8-16!!^dude...we just can't compete with that...especially #2! I would have liked to see more headroom though, it looks kinda cramped.
awesome capture! always liked long exposures of roadways! really like how the vanishing point..actually vanishes