justanotheradikt
Member
- :
- 03 protege dx 5spd
oh wow...awsome. howcome ive never seen that before?
DiS said:ok so at protegefaq, it actually says that drums have better stopping power.....now Im having a dilemma.....to do or not to do this swap.
That is the reason why I bought my LX with the 2.0 l and rear drums ,no abs , Mazda rear disc brakes suck , the calipers need constant mantiance . Heres an example , I have 135000 Kms on my car , The rear drums are still good , If I had rear discs I would have had to replace the rear pads at least 3 times ,Maybe a couple of calipers and at least 2 sets of rotors , for what ,looks , sorry but I will stick with the drum brakes that work when you need them most . If this seeems like a rant it is , I cant justify changing a cars brakes for something that isnt as good for looks , If it wont make the car go faster,handle better,or stop better dont do it .DiS said:ok so at protegefaq, it actually says that drums have better stopping power.....now Im having a dilemma.....to do or not to do this swap.
i completely agree with you man. But when doing the swap, you can always get better disks (power-slot for example) and better pads. I was actually thinking of upgrading to Wilwood big brake kit.macklum said:That is the reason why I bought my LX with the 2.0 l and rear drums ,no abs , Mazda rear disc brakes suck , the calipers need constant mantiance . Heres an example , I have 135000 Kms on my car , The rear drums are still good , If I had rear discs I would have had to replace the rear pads at least 3 times ,Maybe a couple of calipers and at least 2 sets of rotors , for what ,looks , sorry but I will stick with the drum brakes that work when you need them most . If this seeems like a rant it is , I cant justify changing a cars brakes for something that isnt as good for looks , If it wont make the car go faster,handle better,or stop better dont do it .
The problem with the rear discs on a Mazda isnt the rotors or pads its the calipers , they need major amounts of mantiance to work wellDiS said:i completely agree with you man. But when doing the swap, you can always get better disks (power-slot for example) and better pads. I was actually thinking of upgrading to Wilwood big brake kit.
how so? Are you saying that they need more amount of work than front disks?macklum said:The problem with the rear discs on a Mazda isnt the rotors or pads its the calipers , they need major amounts of mantiance to work well
I am not saying that the rear calipers dont work they do , They just need to be lubed and cleaning on a regular bases to work effectivly all the time . From what I understand the 929 MC is a reat upgrade to the stock brake system . How about posting the year and part# for the 929 MC for all to use .vindication said:I'd upgrade to the 929 MC so that should take care of any "ifs" that macklum has
not true. Why would you clean them on regular basis? You would if there would be something wrong with them. Regular maintnance like 30k, 60k, 100k tune up. I changed my front pads 4 weeks ago.....thats at 48,500 miles Thats a 1st brake pad change on my car. Rear disk brakes wear out slower than front. No need for regular maintenancemacklum said:I am not saying that the rear calipers dont work they do , They just need to be lubed and cleaning on a regular bases to work effectivly all the time .
B1ackB0x02 said:I have a 2002 Protege DX, with those retarded rear drums. Is it possible to do a fairly (I use that lightly) painless swap to change them over to rear calipers and rotors? Which cars can I steal the components off of? Or does anyone know of a site where I could get this stuff new at a decent price?
Any help would be appreciated !
Thanks (boom07)
couldn't you just get a pair of the front hubs and disks front dealer and put those on?solid_snake said:you can get them from a 2001+ Protege ES which has 4 wheel disc brakes, but you would have to convert from 4 nuts to 5.