2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart -VID

Despite the 'almighty' twin clutch transmission, doesn't the lack of a real clutch neuter a turbo awd car at launch? A 5 or 6 speed would be a must for me. I don't want an automatic transmission shoved down my throat no matter how good they say it is. Very curious choice Mitsubishi has made for this, and the Evo.
 
I pass. I found something more interesting in the tobaru and nissan world. Coming year is gonna be good year for sport compact fans.
 
a duel clutch is an electronicly shifted manual transmision with two seprete clutches. not an automatic in the traditional automatic with its clutch packs and a converter. mitsubishin will have a manual 5 speed probably later in the production run.
 
Despite the 'almighty' twin clutch transmission, doesn't the lack of a real clutch neuter a turbo awd car at launch? A 5 or 6 speed would be a must for me. I don't want an automatic transmission shoved down my throat no matter how good they say it is. Very curious choice Mitsubishi has made for this, and the Evo.

evo gets either a manual or this highly praised dual cluth automated trans.
Hopefully mitsu will offer the 5 or 5 speed for those like u. Problem solved if they listen.
 
From Car and Driver
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

ESTIMATED PRICE AS TESTED: $29,000 (estimated base price: $27,000)

ENGINE TYPE: turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 122 cu in, 1998cc
Power (SAE net): 237 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 253 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed manual with automated shifting and clutch

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 103.7 in Length: 180.0 in Width: 69.4 in Height: 58.7 in
Curb weight: 3480 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 5.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 15.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 36.5 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 6.2 sec
Standing -mile: 14.3 sec @ 97 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 184 ft
Roadholding, 200-ft-dia skidpad: 0.80 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 17/25 mpg
C/D observed: 16 mpg

FAIL! $27k and .80g on the skidpad?!?

our MS3 gets .87g!!
 
128 feet to stop from 60mph versus 116 in the MS3, 30 less horsepower than the MS3, fugly nose, no true manual transmission. What's not to love? (yawn)
 
lol... nehh looking at that vid.... i would rather get an sti thats like a thousand or more then the ralliart..... still its like 28k :( might as well get the sti or bttr yet evo

In case you haven't checked lately, the STI goes for around $38,000, so that ANOTHER $10,000 on top!
 
the raliarts insurance shouldnt be that bad. when i was looking for a new car a year ago. i priced insurance on an STi and it was going to be cheaper then my speed 3 is. the awd is considered a sefety feature.
 
Too bad every dealer I have been too has it for 38,995 and won't budge on the price, because people are still buying at that price.

Wow! I believe you I was just going off what's on their website. OTD you're looking over 40k! The new EVO supposedly starts at around 33k but I bet it's more like 40k as well. That's not too much less than a BWM 335i
 
Wow! I believe you I was just going off what's on their website. OTD you're looking over 40k! The new EVO supposedly starts at around 33k but I bet it's more like 40k as well. That's not too much less than a BWM 335i

These AWD 4 banger turbo cars are getting crazy in price. I wanted the Evo 9 RS model which was 29k msrp, which I thought was still too much.

The solution is a fun to drive RWD car (not the 350z, which is too heavy). A rear wheel drive 4 banger turbo under 3000 lbs would be ideal, assuming it was below $25,000.
 
These AWD 4 banger turbo cars are getting crazy in price. I wanted the Evo 9 RS model which was 29k msrp, which I thought was still too much.

The solution is a fun to drive RWD car (not the 350z, which is too heavy). A rear wheel drive 4 banger turbo under 3000 lbs would be ideal, assuming it was below $25,000.

if they switched the speed 3 from a fwd to a rwd then there we go! (freak)
 
This car will NOT be handing the MS3 anything, even after tuning. The turbo on the Ralliart is NOT the same as the Evo 9. It is a smaller turbo, so forget your fantasies of getting anywhere close to tuned Evo 9 numbers without replacing the turbo. Next, the transmission...it is not as aggressive as the Evo X's twin-clucth...it is missing the most sporty setting. Also, who knows how much power can be put though this? It might not be as beefy as the Evo Xs twin clutch on purpose. Next, the tires, which need upgrading to get better grip. While an easy change, just tack on more expense. Next, weight...the thing weighs over 3500 lbs. Can't really do much about that. Finally, you have that soft suspension, which is far from Evo...chalk up another upgrade.

Let's take a look at how this wonderful Ralliart stacks up to the highly berated new WRX, and our beloved MS3, all numbers taken from Edmunds Inside Line performance tests:

0-60
Ralliart: 6.6
WRX: 5.9
MS3: 6.1

1/4 mile:
Ralliart: 14.8 @ 94.6
WRX: 14.5 @ 94.4
MS3: 14.5 @ 98.7

Slalom:
Ralliart: 65.0 mph
WRX: 67.7 mph
MS3: 69.3 mph

Skidpad:
Ralliart: 0.81g
WRX: 0.81g
MS3: 0.86g

The Ralliart couldn't best the WRX or MS3 in a single category, whereas the MS3 tops both of them in almost every category, and does top the WRX in some 0-60 tests I've read. This car is not a few small changes away from an Evo, nor even an MS3. I'd be more excited about the upcoming Genesis and 370Z than this.
 
Well they are offering a beefy 5sp tranny for this. My biggest concern is that they got rid of the 4G63. That motor was Mitsubishi. That is the main reason your not going to see high hp numbers out of it. It's a semi-closed aluminum block.

Edit: Thought we were talking about the EVO
 
Back