13.3 on 116 - Praise me

[Speedplease]

why?

 

[jred321]

links don't work

 

[Speedplease]

i really dont know that much about computers but i sent the slips to jonboy maybe he can upload them.

 

[low_psi]

why?

its a dumb thread from last year....

 

[JONBOY688]

timeslip

ok here is the timeslip from him.now u all can call a asshole i dont care. the 60ft mark box was messed up or he staged with his rear wheels. lol it isnt u i am trying to be ass to its just i know my stuff on the dragstrip.u said u couldnt hook up to the end of second gear? right? then i would love to see a pass where u hooked up!!!!!! if u guys think i am such a ass to this guy go to any dragstrip website for example www.shadysidedragway.com and post this slip in the message board. i am telling u a pro mod 2000hp car only 60ft these times and runs 6's in the quarter, pro mod and funny car 60ft .09 somethings. so what i am seeing is a miss infromed timeslip not saying it is ure fault. btw i am a asshole who doesnt know what i am talking about.

 

[Speedplease]

Actually im not the driver my father is, hes 52 and has been racing since he was 18 so he has a lot of time under his belt, so trust me hes not stupid enough to stage with his back wheels. Oh by the way did you get my other slip with the 1.2 60'. that one does not have a pen mark going through it. and i meant he broke traction when he hit second gear not he didnt have traction till second gear sorry my mistake. What is so hard to belive about a 1.2 or 1.15 60' when you have a 2400lb car with full drag suspension and really sticky slicks with over 600hp at the wheels.

 

[Speedplease]

plus those cars with 2000hp arent they controlled by the computer so all the hp is not there on the launch otherwise they would smoke the tires all the way down the track maybe thats why there 60' times are in the same ballpark as mine are. think about it if you launched with all 2000hp and had full traction youd have .6 60' times. But hey who knows

 

[JONBOY688]

if u got over 600 to the wheels ure times are way off too. btw man its cool i will let it be.and thanks for the slips even though it is still a unreal 60ft time!!!

 

[Speedplease]

cool man now if i could get those 60' times with my speed it would be awesome! LOL peace

 

[kwiktsi]

The thing that doesn't make sense is an awesome 60'. crappy et and "ok" mph. If you get a good 60, you will get a good ET at a lower MPH. That MPH is high for what the car ran- indicating a poor launch but good top end pull, yet it supposedly launched like a rocket. Cars with full drag suspensions will run that same ET at 109 or so- with a normal 1.50-1.60 60' (with decent suspension). Not calling you a liar- but NONE of the numbers match up.

Joe

Actually im not the driver my father is, hes 52 and has been racing since he was 18 so he has a lot of time under his belt, so trust me hes not stupid enough to stage with his back wheels. Oh by the way did you get my other slip with the 1.2 60'. that one does not have a pen mark going through it. and i meant he broke traction when he hit second gear not he didnt have traction till second gear sorry my mistake. What is so hard to belive about a 1.2 or 1.15 60' when you have a 2400lb car with full drag suspension and really sticky slicks with over 600hp at the wheels.

 

[BlueWolfCry]

here we go again...

The thing that doesn't make sense is an awesome 60'. crappy et and "ok" mph. If you get a good 60, you will get a good ET at a lower MPH. That MPH is high for what the car ran- indicating a poor launch but good top end pull, yet it supposedly launched like a rocket. Cars with full drag suspensions will run that same ET at 109 or so- with a normal 1.50-1.60 60' (with decent suspension). Not calling you a liar- but NONE of the numbers match up.

Joe

 

[JONBOY688]

thanks joe!!!! like i said i aint trying to be ass at all but it is impossable had to be a track error!!!!!!!!!!!!!