- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
After a night's sleep, I realized that the large variations are due to me combining samples from about 7 accel runs. Different road grades, and wind would have made the car accelerate slightly differently. Each run was short (from 0-50ish for most) which didn't help.
Just an FYI for those considering an MX+, and might be mislead by the above graph. I'm amazed by the similarity of T and HP compared to the dyno graphs...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MX+ samples are erratic, probably due to RPM PID polled at slightly different time than calculated HP.
Dyno was from web for 2016ish CX-5.
Last edited: